Building level flood exposure analysis using a hydrodynamic model. (October 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bertsch, Robert; Glenis, Vassilis; Kilsby, Chris
• Is Part Of: Environmental modelling & software. Volume 156(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-10
• Subjects: Urban flooding -- Flood exposure -- Model validation -- Open-source code -- Hydrodynamic flood modelling; Environmental monitoring -- Computer programs -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Computer simulation -- Periodicals; Digital computer simulation -- Periodicals; Computer software -- Periodicals; Environmental Monitoring -- Periodicals; Computer Simulation -- Periodicals; Environnement -- Surveillance -- Logiciels -- Périodiques; Écologie -- Simulation, Méthodes de -- Périodiques; Simulation par ordinateur -- Périodiques; Logiciels -- Périodiques; Computer software; Digital computer simulation; Ecology -- Computer simulation; Environmental monitoring -- Computer programs; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 363.70015118
• DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105490
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1364-8152

Abstract

Abstract: The advent of detailed hydrodynamic model simulations of urban flooding has not been matched by improved capabilities in flood exposure analysis which rely on validation against observed data. This work introduces a generic, building-level flood exposure analysis tool applying high resolution flood data and building geometries derived from hydrodynamic simulations performed with the 2D hydrodynamic flood modelling software CityCAT. Validation data were obtained from a survey of affected residents following a large pluvial flood event in Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. Sensitivity testing was carried out for different hydrodynamic model and exposure tool settings and between 68% and 75% of the surveyed buildings were correctly modelled as either flooded or not flooded. The tool tends to underrepresent flooding with a better performance in identifying true negatives (i.e. no flooding observed with no flooding modelled) compared to true positives. As higher true positive rates were accompanied by higher false positive rates, no single scenario could be identified as the optimal solution. However, the results suggest a greater sensitivity of the results to the classification scheme than to the buffer distance applied. Overall, if applied to high resolution flood depth maps, the method is efficient and suitable for application to large urban areas for flood risk management and insurance analysis purposes. Highlights: A flood exposure analysis tool which uses high resolution inundation grids and detailed building geometries for cities avoiding aggregation of data. The tool is validated against observed data collected after a large pluvial flood event. Developed as a Python-based Jupyter notebook the code can be easily adapted and extended to accommodate specific user needs. Decision making support tool for stakeholders in flood risk management.