Working memory and cognitive flexibility predict growth trajectories of sluggish cognitive tempo in youth with spina bifida. Issue 8 (17th November 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Smith, Zoe R.; Del Castillo, Allison; Clark, Olivia E.; Holmbeck, Grayson N.
• Is Part Of: Child neuropsychology. Volume 28:Issue 8(2022)
• Page Start: 1052
• Page End: 1071
• Publication Date: 2022-11-17
• Subjects: Spina bifida -- sluggish cognitive tempo -- working memory -- cognitive flexibility -- neuropsychological functioning; Pediatric neuropsychology -- Periodicals; Adolescent psychology -- Periodicals; Child development deviations -- Periodicals; Child psychology -- Periodicals; 618.92805
• DOI: 10.1080/09297049.2022.2042503
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0929-7049

Abstract

ABSTRACT: As sluggish cognitive tempo (SCT) shows similar inattention and neuropsychological dysfunction as youth with spina bifida (SB), it is important to examine whether neuropsychological functioning may affect the development of SCT in this population. Participants were 140 youth with SB and their parents who participated in five waves of a longitudinal study across eight years (ages 8–15 years at Time 1). At Time 1, teacher-, mother-, and father-report of SCT showed 9%, 8.3%, and 5.3% impairment in SCT respectively compared to other youth in the sample. Growth curves were used to examine changes over time in mother-, father-, and teacher-reported SCT. Four neurocognitive variables were included (attention, working memory, cognitive flexibility, plan/organize) as predictor variables of SCT growth and intercepts. Mother, father, and teacher-report of SCT were included in separate models. Age and shunt status were included as covariates in the growth models. Inattentive symptoms were also included as a covariate in working memory, shift, and plan/organize models. Worse working memory at Time 1 predicted an increase in mother-reported SCT symptoms over eight years (β = −.28) and poorer cognitive shifting skills predicted higher rates of teacher-reported SCT over time (β = −.61). All other neurocognitive variables predicted the intercept, but not the slope of SCT symptoms. Results indicate that worse neurocognitive functioning is associated with higher levels of SCT symptoms and that worse working memory and cognitive flexibility at baseline predicted an increase in SCT symptoms as youth with SB age. It may be important for clinicians to monitor and assess levels of SCT in youth with SB.