Comparison of interpolation methods for soil moisture prediction on China's Loess Plateau. Issue 1 (13th April 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison of interpolation methods for soil moisture prediction on China's Loess Plateau. Issue 1 (13th April 2020)
- Main Title:
- Comparison of interpolation methods for soil moisture prediction on China's Loess Plateau
- Authors:
- Xie, Baoni
Jia, Xiaoxu
Qin, Zhanfei
Zhao, Chunlei
Shao, Ming'an - Abstract:
- Abstract: Due to limited in situ observations, prediction of large‐scale soil moisture content (SMC) for deep soil layers via interpolation is usually very challenging. This is especially true for regions with high spatial variations of terrain features. For precise prediction at a regional scale, SMC data for the 0‐ to 500‐cm soil profile across China's Loess Plateau (CLP) region were collected and interpolated using four different methods. The methods included inverse distance weighting (IDW), ordinary kriging (OK), multiple linear regression with residual kriging (MLR‐RK), and radial basis function neural network with residual kriging (RBFNN‐RK). The objective of the study was to determine the optimal interpolation method for predicting regional SMC at various soil layers. The study showed that the performances of IDW, OK, and RBFNN‐RK in predicting SMC were generally much better than that of MLR‐RK. Specifically, IDW performed best for soil depths of 200‒300 and 400‒500 cm. This was attributed to the more uniform distribution (smoother change of spatial clusters) of SMC in these two layers. The OK method performed best for the 10‐ to 40‐ and 40‐ to 100‐cm soil layers, which was due to the strong spatial dependence of the two layers. The RBFNN‐RK performed best for the 0‐ to 10‐, 100‐ to 200‐, and 300‐ to 400‐cm soil layers, because RBFNN‐RK captures nonlinear relations of SMC with environmental factors. Ordinary kriging, IDW, and RBFNN‐RK interpolation can therefore beAbstract: Due to limited in situ observations, prediction of large‐scale soil moisture content (SMC) for deep soil layers via interpolation is usually very challenging. This is especially true for regions with high spatial variations of terrain features. For precise prediction at a regional scale, SMC data for the 0‐ to 500‐cm soil profile across China's Loess Plateau (CLP) region were collected and interpolated using four different methods. The methods included inverse distance weighting (IDW), ordinary kriging (OK), multiple linear regression with residual kriging (MLR‐RK), and radial basis function neural network with residual kriging (RBFNN‐RK). The objective of the study was to determine the optimal interpolation method for predicting regional SMC at various soil layers. The study showed that the performances of IDW, OK, and RBFNN‐RK in predicting SMC were generally much better than that of MLR‐RK. Specifically, IDW performed best for soil depths of 200‒300 and 400‒500 cm. This was attributed to the more uniform distribution (smoother change of spatial clusters) of SMC in these two layers. The OK method performed best for the 10‐ to 40‐ and 40‐ to 100‐cm soil layers, which was due to the strong spatial dependence of the two layers. The RBFNN‐RK performed best for the 0‐ to 10‐, 100‐ to 200‐, and 300‐ to 400‐cm soil layers, because RBFNN‐RK captures nonlinear relations of SMC with environmental factors. Ordinary kriging, IDW, and RBFNN‐RK interpolation can therefore be used to predict regional SMC for different soil layers in CLP region. The RBFNN‐RK method was recommended for predicting regional SMC in complex topographic hilly‐gully regions where there is nonlinear relation between SMC and environmental variables. Core Ideas: Four interpolation methods were assessed in predicting soil moisture content (SMC). Different methods exhibited different performances in the prediction of SMC. The performances of IDW, OK, and RBFNN‐RK in predicting SMC were better than MLR‐RK. The RBFNN‐RK method was recommended for use in predicting SMC at the regional scale. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Vadose zone journal. Volume 19:Issue 1(2020)
- Journal:
- Vadose zone journal
- Issue:
- Volume 19:Issue 1(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 19, Issue 1 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 19
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0019-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- n/a
- Page End:
- n/a
- Publication Date:
- 2020-04-13
- Subjects:
- Soil science -- Periodicals
Zone of aeration -- Periodicals
Groundwater flow -- Periodicals
Groundwater flow
Zone of aeration
Periodicals
Electronic journals
631.4 - Journal URLs:
- https://www.soils.org/publications/vzj ↗
http://vzj.geoscienceworld.org/ ↗
https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15391663 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/vzj2.20025 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1539-1663
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23276.xml