Sex is a strong prognostic factor in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer patients and should be considered in survival rate estimation. (August 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Sex is a strong prognostic factor in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer patients and should be considered in survival rate estimation. (August 2020)
- Main Title:
- Sex is a strong prognostic factor in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer patients and should be considered in survival rate estimation
- Authors:
- Barquín, Miguel
Calvo, Virginia
García-García, Francisco
Nuñez, Beatriz
Sánchez-Herrero, Estela
Serna-Blasco, Roberto
Auglytė, Milda
Carcereny, Enric
Rodriguez-Abreu, Delvys
López Castro, Rafael
Guirado, María
Camps, Carlos
Bosch-Barrera, Joaquín
Massuti, Bartomeu
Ortega, Ana Laura
del Barco, Edel
Gonzalez-Larriba, José Luis
Aguiar, David
García-Campelo, Rosario
Dómine, Manuel
Agraso, Sara
Sala, Mª Angeles
Oramas, Juana
Bernabé, Reyes
Blanco, Remei
Parejo, Consuelo
Cruz, Alberto
Menasalvas, Ernestina
Royuela, Ana
Romero, Atocha
Provencio, Mariano
… (more) - Abstract:
- Highlights: Sex is a major factor in disease, but it is seldom taken into account for survival estimations. Using RWD we confirm that NSCLC females had a significantly better prognosis than NSCLC males. The effect size of sex on survival is high supporting sex-based medicine as a new paradigm in medical practice. Abstract: Background: Biological differences between the sexes have a major impact on disease and treatment outcome. In this paper, we evaluate the prognostic value of sex in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the context of routine clinical data, and compare this information with other external datasets. Methods: Clinical data from stage IV NSCLC patients from Hospital Puerta de Hierro (HPH) were retrieved from electronic health records using big data analytics (N = 397). In addition, data from the Spanish Lung Cancer Group (GECP) Tumor Registry (N = 1382) and from a published study available from the cBioPortal (MSK) (N = 601) were analyzed. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to assess the prognostic value of sex. A meta-analysis to compare the outcome for males and females in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) was performed. Results: The median OS time was 12 months for males and 19 months for females (overall HR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.68–0.87; P < 0.001). Similarly, females with stage IV NSCLC harboring an EGFR -sensitizing mutation livedHighlights: Sex is a major factor in disease, but it is seldom taken into account for survival estimations. Using RWD we confirm that NSCLC females had a significantly better prognosis than NSCLC males. The effect size of sex on survival is high supporting sex-based medicine as a new paradigm in medical practice. Abstract: Background: Biological differences between the sexes have a major impact on disease and treatment outcome. In this paper, we evaluate the prognostic value of sex in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the context of routine clinical data, and compare this information with other external datasets. Methods: Clinical data from stage IV NSCLC patients from Hospital Puerta de Hierro (HPH) were retrieved from electronic health records using big data analytics (N = 397). In addition, data from the Spanish Lung Cancer Group (GECP) Tumor Registry (N = 1382) and from a published study available from the cBioPortal (MSK) (N = 601) were analyzed. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to assess the prognostic value of sex. A meta-analysis to compare the outcome for males and females in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) was performed. Results: The median OS time was 12 months for males and 19 months for females (overall HR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.68–0.87; P < 0.001). Similarly, females with stage IV NSCLC harboring an EGFR -sensitizing mutation lived significantly longer than males (median OS: males, 19 months; females, 32 months) with a lower risk of death compared with males (overall HR = 0.75; 95% CI: 0.67–0.84). In addition, female patients benefited more from EGFR inhibitors in terms of PFS and OS (overall HR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.32–0.64, and HR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.48–0.80, respectively). Median PFS was 21 months in females and 12 months in males (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Using routine clinical data we confirmed the previous finding that among stage IV NSCLC patients, females had a significantly better prognosis than males. The effect size of the sex was notable, highlighting the fact that survival rates are usually estimated and patients are generally managed without considering the sexes separately, which may lead to suboptimal results. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Cancer epidemiology. Volume 67(2020:Aug.)
- Journal:
- Cancer epidemiology
- Issue:
- Volume 67(2020:Aug.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 67 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 67
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0067-0000-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-08
- Subjects:
- Non-small cell lung cancer -- EGFR -- Gender -- Female -- Sex
Cancer -- Epidemiology -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Prevention -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Diagnosis -- Periodicals
Carcinogenesis -- Periodicals
616.994005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/18777821 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.canep.2020.101737 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1877-7821
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3046.477910
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23271.xml