Psychological measures of patient's decision-making for prenatal genetic testing. (2nd November 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Psychological measures of patient's decision-making for prenatal genetic testing. (2nd November 2022)
- Main Title:
- Psychological measures of patient's decision-making for prenatal genetic testing
- Authors:
- Herrera, Kimberly M.
Milone, Gina
Davis, Jay A.
Persad, Malini D.
Dinglas, Cheryl
Heiselman, Cassandra
Buckley, Ayisha
Garretto, Diana
Pastore, Lisa M. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objective: To use a questionnaire to determine the levels of maternal decision-related distress, clarity of the pros and cons, and certainty when considering prenatal genetic diagnostic testing; and to assess the relationship between these constructs and patient characteristics. Method: Cross-sectional study. Voluntary, anonymous questionnaires distributed 2017–2019 to women referred for invasive prenatal genetic testing. Excluded: English or Spanish illiterate. Maternal characteristics were collected. Questions evaluated distress, decisional certainty, and decisional clarity on a 5-point Likert scale (range: 0 = low/uncertain/unclear to 4 = high/certain/clear). Analysis: non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis, correlation statistics, and ANOVA. Results: Forty-four female patients completed it. Most were married, white, Catholic, and multiparous. 58% had already made a testing decision. Patients expressed low distress levels (mean 1.18 ± 0.80) and expressed high decisional certainty (mean 3.28 ± 0.76) and clarity (mean 3.30 ± 0.99). Decisional certainty and clarity were positively correlated ( r = 0.47, p < .01), whereas distress was negatively correlated with decisional certainty ( r = −0.8136, p < .0005) and decisional clarity ( r = −0.49, p = .007). No significant differences by religion or parity. Greater distress ( p < .05) and less decisional clarity ( p = .07) occurred between those still debating testing vs those who had decided. Conclusions: Higher maternalAbstract: Objective: To use a questionnaire to determine the levels of maternal decision-related distress, clarity of the pros and cons, and certainty when considering prenatal genetic diagnostic testing; and to assess the relationship between these constructs and patient characteristics. Method: Cross-sectional study. Voluntary, anonymous questionnaires distributed 2017–2019 to women referred for invasive prenatal genetic testing. Excluded: English or Spanish illiterate. Maternal characteristics were collected. Questions evaluated distress, decisional certainty, and decisional clarity on a 5-point Likert scale (range: 0 = low/uncertain/unclear to 4 = high/certain/clear). Analysis: non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis, correlation statistics, and ANOVA. Results: Forty-four female patients completed it. Most were married, white, Catholic, and multiparous. 58% had already made a testing decision. Patients expressed low distress levels (mean 1.18 ± 0.80) and expressed high decisional certainty (mean 3.28 ± 0.76) and clarity (mean 3.30 ± 0.99). Decisional certainty and clarity were positively correlated ( r = 0.47, p < .01), whereas distress was negatively correlated with decisional certainty ( r = −0.8136, p < .0005) and decisional clarity ( r = −0.49, p = .007). No significant differences by religion or parity. Greater distress ( p < .05) and less decisional clarity ( p = .07) occurred between those still debating testing vs those who had decided. Conclusions: Higher maternal distress scores were associated with lower decisional certainty and decisional clarity in women considering prenatal genetic testing. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine. Volume 35:Number 21(2022)
- Journal:
- Journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 35:Number 21(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 35, Issue 21 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 35
- Issue:
- 21
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0035-0021-0000
- Page Start:
- 4130
- Page End:
- 4136
- Publication Date:
- 2022-11-02
- Subjects:
- Prenatal genetic testing; -- amniocentesis; -- screening; -- patient understanding
Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Perinatology -- Periodicals
Infants (Newborn) -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Neonatology -- Periodicals
618.2 - Journal URLs:
- http://informahealthcare.com/loi/jmf ↗
http://informahealthcare.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1080/14767058.2020.1847074 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1476-7058
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5012.332000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23261.xml