3D Killer Turn Angle in Transtibial Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Determined by the Graft Turning Angle both in the Sagittal and Coronal Planes. Issue 9 (3rd August 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jia, Gengxin; Tang, Yuchen; Liu, Zhongcheng; Peng, Bo; Da, Lijun; Yang, Jun; Liu, Xiaolong; Ma, Ming; Han, Hua; Wu, Meng; Geng, Bin; Xia, Yayi; Teng, Yuanjun
• Is Part Of: Orthopaedic surgery. Volume 14:Issue 9(2022)
• Page Start: 2298
• Page End: 2306
• Publication Date: 2022-08-03
• Subjects: Graft turning angle -- Killer turn -- Tibial tunnel approach -- Transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Orthopedic surgery -- Periodicals; Orthopedics -- Periodicals; Musculoskeletal system -- Wounds and injuries -- Periodicals; 617.47005
• DOI: 10.1111/os.13411
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1757-7853

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: During the transtibial posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction, surgeons commonly pay more attention to the graft turning angle in the sagittal plane (GASP), but the graft turning angle in the coronal plane (GACP) is always neglected. This study hypothesized that the three‐dimensional (3D) killer turn angle was determined by both the GASP and GACP, and aimed to quantitively analyze the effects of the GASP and GACP on the 3D killer turn angle. Methods: This was an in‐vitro computer simulation study of transtibial PCL reconstruction using 3D knee models. Patients with knee injuries who were CT scanned were selected from the CT database (April 2019 to January 2021) at a local hospital for reviewing. A total of 60 3D knees were simulated based on the knees' CT data. The femoral and tibial PCL attachment were located on the 3D knee model using the Rhinoceros software. The tibial tunnels were simulated based on different GASP and GACP. The effects of the GASP and GACP on the 3D killer turn angle were quantitatively analyzed. One‐way analysis of variance was used to compare the outcomes in different groups. The regression analysis was performed to identify variables of the GASP and GACP which significantly affected 3D killer turn angle. Results: The 3D killer turn angle showed a significant proportional relationship not only with the GASP ( r 2 > 0.868, P < 0.001), but also with the GACP ( r 2 > 0.467, P < 0.001). Every 10° change of the GACP caused 2.8° to 4.4° change of the 3D killer turn angle, whereas every 10° change of the GASP caused 6.4° to 9.2° change of the 3D killer turn angle. Conclusions: The 3D killer turn angle was significantly affected by both the GASP and GACP. During the transtibial PCL reconstruction, the proximal anterolateral tibial tunnel approach could increase the 3D killer turn angle more obviously compared with the most distal anteromedial tibial tunnel approach. To minimize the killer turn effect, both the GASP and GACP were required to be considered to increase. Abstract : Schematic of the graft angulation in the sagittal plane and the coronal plane. A: the graft angulation in the sagittal plane; B: the graft angulation in the coronal plane.