Norwegian Clinicians' Experiences of Learnability and Usability of SCID-II, SCID-5-PD and SCID-5-AMPD-I Interviews: A Sequential Multi-Group Qualitative Approach. Issue 5 (3rd September 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Norwegian Clinicians' Experiences of Learnability and Usability of SCID-II, SCID-5-PD and SCID-5-AMPD-I Interviews: A Sequential Multi-Group Qualitative Approach. Issue 5 (3rd September 2022)
- Main Title:
- Norwegian Clinicians' Experiences of Learnability and Usability of SCID-II, SCID-5-PD and SCID-5-AMPD-I Interviews: A Sequential Multi-Group Qualitative Approach
- Authors:
- Heltne, Aleksander
Bode, Christina
Hummelen, Benjamin
Falkum, Erik
Selvik, Sara Germans
Paap, Muirne C. S. - Abstract:
- Abstract: The DSM-5 presents two competing diagnostic frameworks for personality disorders: the standard categorical model and the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD). The AMPD was initially criticized for being too complex and theory laden for clinical implementation. Though inter-rater reliability studies have contested initial claims of the model's complexity, little attention has been paid to how clinicians experience the usability and learnability of either model. We interviewed twenty Norwegian clinicians about their experiences with either the SCID-II/5-PD (n = 9), SCID-5-AMPD-I (n = 8), or both (n = 3). Separate thematic analyses were conducted for SCID-II/5-PD and SCID-5-AMPD-I groups, and group themes were compared. We identified four themes for each group, relating to required skills, training, challenges and information gained through the interview. We found that training and clinical experience were considered to be important for both interviews. Moreover, the SCID-5-AMPD-I was considered to rely more explicitly on theory specific to the development and content of the AMPD model in general and the LPFS specifically We also identified shared and unique challenges and shortcomings of each interview. We comment on how our findings relate to the debate surrounding the AMPD, and recommend development of clear training guidelines for both interviews.
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of personality assessment. Volume 104:Issue 5(2022)
- Journal:
- Journal of personality assessment
- Issue:
- Volume 104:Issue 5(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 104, Issue 5 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 104
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0104-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 599
- Page End:
- 612
- Publication Date:
- 2022-09-03
- Subjects:
- Personality assessment -- Periodicals
Psychology
Periodicals
155.28 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/hjpa20 ↗
http://www.tandfonline.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1080/00223891.2021.1975726 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0022-3891
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5030.950000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23236.xml