Sexual dimorphism in cranial shape and size in geomyoid rodents: multivariate and evolutionary perspectives. Issue 4 (25th August 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Calede, Jonathan J M; Brown, Andrew
• Editors: Jia, Zhi-Yun
• Is Part Of: Current zoology. Volume 68:Issue 4(2022)
• Page Start: 469
• Page End: 488
• Publication Date: 2021-08-25
• Subjects: Geomyidae -- Heteromyidae -- phylogenetic comparative methods -- morphometrics -- Rensch's rule; Zoology -- Periodicals; Zoology -- China -- Periodicals; 590.5
• DOI: 10.1093/cz/zoab070
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1674-5507

Abstract

Abstract: Geomyoid rodents provide a great study system for the analysis of sexual dimorphism. They are polygynic and many inhabit harsh arid environments thought to promote sexual dimorphism. In fact, there has been extensive work published on the sexual size dimorphism of individual populations and species within this rodent clade. However, little work has been undertaken to assess the evolutionary patterns and processes associated with this sexual dimorphism. We use multivariate analyses of cranial measurements in a phylogenetic framework to determine the distribution of size and shape dimorphism among geomyoids and test for Rensch's rule. Our results suggest that sexual dimorphism is more common in geomyids than heteromyids, but it is not in fact universal. There is evidence for variation in sexual dimorphism across populations. Additionally, in many taxa, geographic variation appears to overwhelm existing sexual dimorphism. We find support for the repeated independent evolution of shape and size dimorphism across geomyoid taxa, but we do not find support for an association between size and shape dimorphism. There is no evidence for Rensch's rule in geomyoids, whether at the superfamily or family level. Together, our findings suggest that there is no single explanation for the evolution of sexual dimorphism in geomyoids and that, instead, it is the product of numerous evolutionary events. Future studies incorporating phylogenetic relationships will be necessary to paint a more complete picture of the evolution of sexual dimorphism in geomyoids.