An Anatomic Study of the Proximal Tibial Epiphysis With Relevance to Percutaneous Epiphysiodesis Using Transphyseal Screws (PETS). Issue 9 (8th October 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Do, Michael T.; McCarthy, Conor F.; Cooperman, Daniel R.; Liu, Raymond W.
• Is Part Of: Journal of pediatric orthopaedics. Volume 42:Issue 9(2022)
• Page Start: e932
• Page End: e936
• Publication Date: 2022-10-08
• Subjects: anatomic study -- proximal tibial epiphysis -- percutaneous epiphysiodesis using transphyseal screws (PETS); Pediatric orthopedics -- Periodicals; 618.927
• DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002231
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0271-6798

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Percutaneous epiphysiodesis using transphyseal screws (PETS) is a common procedure to correct lower extremity limb-length discrepancies in the pediatric population. A potential complication of this procedure is development of tibial valgus deformity, which may occur secondary to decreased screw purchase in the thinner medial proximal tibial epiphysis. The thickness of the proximal tibial epiphysis has not yet been well quantified, which was the aim of this study. Methods: Three-dimensional surface scans of 32 cadaveric proximal tibial epiphyses in specimens aged 3 to 17 years old were obtained and computer modeling software was utilized to measure the thickness of the proximal tibial epiphysis at 20 standardized potential screw insertion points according to a generated 5×4 map. Results: When normalized to the total width of the proximal tibial epiphysis, the lateral side is thicker compared with the medial side. The positions with the greatest thickness are located at the midline in the sagittal plane and 33% of the total physeal width away from the medial and lateral edges in the coronal plane (0.265 and 0.261 normalized thickness, respectively). The proximal tibial epiphysis is particularly thin 25% from the medial edge (normalized thickness range: 0.196 to 0.221). Multiple regression analysis revealed a significant relationship between increasing age and female sex with thinner normalized medial and lateral heights. Conclusions: During PETS, areas for greater screw purchase are located centrally in the sagittal plane and 33% of the total width away from the medial and lateral edges of the proximal tibial epiphysis in the coronal plane. Caution should be taken when inserting screws in the medial 25% of the proximal tibial epiphysis as it is thinner relative to the lateral edge, particularly in females. Clinical Relevance: This study provides quantitative, anatomic data on the thickness of the proximal tibial epiphysis, which can direct screw placement during PETS for correcting limb-length discrepancies. These data may help lessen the risk of developing tibial valgus deformity although future clinical studies are necessary to fully evaluate this possibility.