Safety Attitude of Operating Room Personnel Associated With Accurate Completion of a Surgical Checklist: A Cross-sectional Observational Study. Issue 5 (17th August 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sens, Florence; Viprey, Marie; Piriou, Vincent; Peix, Jean-Louis; Herquelot, Eléonore; Occelli, Pauline; Bourdy, Stéphanie; Gawande, Atul A.; Carty MJ, Matthew J.; Michel, Philippe; Lifante, Jean-Christophe; Colin, Cyrille; Duclos, Antoine
• Is Part Of: Journal of patient safety. Volume 18:Issue 5(2022)
• Page Start: 449
• Page End: 456
• Publication Date: 2022-08-17
• Subjects: checklist -- guideline adherence -- risk adjustment -- surgical procedures -- determinants -- safety -- World Health Organization; Patients -- Safety measures -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Practice -- Safety measures -- Periodicals; Medical errors -- Prevention -- Periodicals; 610.289
• DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000954
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1549-8417

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: How the checklist is executed in routine practice may reflect the teamwork and safety climate in the operating room (OR). This cross-sectional study aimed to identify whether the presence of a fully completed checklist in medical records was associated with teams' safety attitudes. Methods: Data from 29 French hospitals, including 5677 operated patients and 834 OR professionals, were prospectively collected. The degree of checklist compliance was categorized for each patient in 1 of 4 ways: full, incomplete, inaccurate, and no checklist completed. The members of OR teams were invited to complete a questionnaire including teamwork climate measurement (Safety Attitudes Questionnaire) and their opinion regarding checklist use, checklist audibly reading, and communication change with checklist. Multilevel modeling was performed to investigate the effect of variables related to hospitals and professionals on checklist compliance, after adjustment for patient characteristics. Results: A checklist was present for 83% of patients, but only 35% demonstrated full completion. Compared with no checklist, full completion was associated with higher safety attitude (high teamwork climate [adjusted odds ratio for full completion, 4.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.75–9.76]; communication change [1.31, 1.04–1.66]; checklist aloud reading [1.16, 1.02–1.32]) and was reinforced by the designation of a checklist coordinator (2.43, 1.06–5.55). Incomplete completion was also associated with enhanced safety attitude contrary to inaccurate completion. Conclusions: Compliance with checklists is associated with safer OR team practice and can be considered as an indicator of the extent of safety in OR practice.