Automated detection of nocturnal motor seizures using an audio‐video system. Issue 9 (8th August 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Armand Larsen, Sidsel; Terney, Daniella; Østerkjerhuus, Tim; Vinding Merinder, Torsten; Annala, Kaapo; Knight, Andrew; Beniczky, Sándor
• Is Part Of: Brain and behavior. Volume 12:Issue 9(2022)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2022-08-08
• Subjects: audio‐video surveillance system -- automated seizure detection -- hypermotor seizures -- nocturnal seizures -- tonic‐clonic seizures; Neurology -- Periodicals; Neurosciences -- Periodicals; Psychology -- Periodicals; Psychiatry -- Periodicals; 616.8005
• DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2737
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2162-3279

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Unsupervised nocturnal tonic‐clonic seizures (TCSs) may lead to sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Major motor seizures (TCSs and hypermotor seizures) may lead to injuries. Our goal was to develop and validate an automated audio‐video system for the real‐time detection of major nocturnal motor seizures. Methods: In this Phase‐3 clinical validation study, we assessed the performance of automated detection of nocturnal motor seizures using audio‐video streaming, computer vision and an artificial intelligence‐based algorithm (Nelli). The detection threshold was predefined, the validation dataset was independent from the training dataset, patients were prospectively recruited, and the analysis was performed in real time. The gold standard was based on expert evaluation of long‐term video electroencephalography (EEG). The primary outcome was the detection of nocturnal major motor seizures (TCSs and hypermotor seizures). The secondary outcome was the detection of other (minor) nocturnal motor seizures. Results: We recruited 191 participants aged 1–72 years (median: 20 years), and we monitored them for 4183 h during the night. Device deficiency was present 10.5% of the time. Fifty‐one patients had nocturnal motor seizures during the recording. The sensitivity for the major motor seizures was 93.7% (95% confidence interval: 69.8%–99.8%). The system detected all 11 TCS and four out of five (80%) hypermotor seizures. For the minor motor seizure types, the sensitivity was low (8.3%). The false detection rate was 0.16 per h. Conclusion: The Nelli system detects nocturnal major motor seizures with a high sensitivity and is suitable for implementation in institutions (hospitals, residential care facilities), where rapid interventions triggered by alarms can potentially reduce the risk of SUDEP and injuries.