Proficiency‐based progression training for robotic surgery skills training: a randomized clinical trial. (16th June 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: De Groote, Ruben; Puliatti, Stefano; Amato, Marco; Mazzone, Elio; Rosiello, Giuseppe; Farinha, Rui; Paludo, Artur; Desender, Liesbeth; Van Cleynenbreugel, Ben; Bunting, Brendan P.; Mottrie, Alexandre; Gallagher, Anthony G.
• Other Names: Larcher Alessandro investigator.; Uvin Pieter investigator.; Decoene Jasper investigator.; Tuyten Tom investigator.; D'Hondt Mathieu investigator.; Hubert Nicolas investigator.; Chatzopoulos Charles investigator.; De Troyer Bart investigator.
• Is Part Of: BJU international. Volume 130:Number 4(2022)
• Page Start: 528
• Page End: 535
• Publication Date: 2022-06-16
• Subjects: basic skills training -- proficiency‐based progression -- robotic surgery -- training -- surgical simulation -- #Urology; Genitourinary organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Genitourinary organs -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Urology -- Periodicals; 616.6
• DOI: 10.1111/bju.15811
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1464-4096

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: To determine whether proficiency‐based progression (PBP) training leads to better robotic surgical performance compared to traditional training (TT), given that the value of PBP training for learning robotic surgical skills is unclear. Materials and Methods: The PROVESA trial is a multicentric, prospective, randomized and blinded clinical study comparing PBP training with TT for robotic suturing and knot‐tying anastomosis skills. A total of 36 robotic surgery‐naïve junior residents were recruited from 16 training sites and 12 residency training programmes. Participants were randomly allocated to metric‐based PBP training or the current standard of care TT, and compared at the end of training. The primary outcome was percentage of participants reaching the predefined proficiency benchmark. Secondary outcomes were the numbers of procedure steps and errors made. Results: Of the group that received TT, 3/18 reached the proficiency benchmark versus 12/18 of the PBP group (i.e. the PBP group were ~10 times as likely to demonstrate proficiency [ P = 0.006]). The PBP group demonstrated a 51% reduction in number of performance errors from baseline to the final assessment (18.3 vs 8.9). The TT group demonstrated a marginal improvement (15.94 vs 15.44) in errors made. Conclusions: The PROVESA trial is the first prospective randomized controlled trial on basic skills training in robotic surgery. Implementation of a PBP training methodology resulted in superior surgical performance for robotic suturing and knot‐tying anastomosis performance. Compared to TT, better surgical quality could be obtained by implementing PBP training for basic skills in robotic surgery.