Oral diadochokinetic rates across languages: Multilingual speakers comparison. Issue 5 (31st July 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chu, Shin Ying; Foong, Jia Hao; Lee, Jaehoon; Ben‐David, Boaz M.; Barlow, Steven M.; Hsu, Cristiane
• Is Part Of: International journal of language & communication disorders. Volume 56:Issue 5(2021)
• Page Start: 1026
• Page End: 1036
• Publication Date: 2021-07-31
• Subjects: adults -- ageing -- Malay speakers -- nonword -- oral diadochokinetic rate -- real word; Communicative disorders -- Periodicals; Speech therapy -- Periodicals; Speech disorders -- Periodicals; Language disorders -- Periodicals; 616.855
• DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12653
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1368-2822

Abstract

Abstract: Background: It is unclear whether oral diadochokinetic rate (oral‐DDK) performance is affected by different languages within a multilingual country. Aims: This study investigated the effects of age, sex, and stimulus type (real word in L1, L2 vs. non‐word) on oral‐DDK rates among healthy Malaysian‐Malay speakers in order to establish language‐ and age‐sensitive norms. The second aim was to compared the nonword 'pataka' oral‐DDK rates produced by Malaysian‐Malay speakers on currently available normative data for Hebrew speakers and Malaysian‐Mandarin speakers. Methods & Procedures: Oral‐DDK performance of 90 participants (aged 20–77 years) using nonword ('pataka'), Malay real word ('patahkan'), and English real word ('buttercake') was audio recorded. The number of syllables produced in 8 seconds was calculated. Mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to examine the effects of stimulus type (nonword, Malay, and English real word), sex (male, female), age (younger, 20–40 years; middle, 41–60 years; older, ≥61 years), and their interactions on the oral‐DDK rate. Data obtained were also compared with the raw data of Malaysian‐Mandarin and Hebrew speakers from the previous studies. Outcomes & Results: A normative oral‐DDK rate has been established for healthy Malaysian‐Malay speakers. The oral‐DDK rate was significantly affected by stimuli ( p < 0.001). Malay real word showed the slowest rate, whereas there was no significant difference between English real word and nonword. The oral‐DDK rate for Malay speakers was significantly higher than Mandarin and Hebrew speakers across stimuli (all p < 0.01). Interestingly, oral‐DDK rates were not affected by age group for Malay speakers. Conclusions & Implications: Stimuli type and language affect the oral‐DDK rate, indicating that speech‐language therapists should consider using language‐specific norms when assessing multilingual speakers. What this paper adds: What is already known on the subject: Age, sex, and language are factors that need to be considered when developing oral‐DDK normative protocol. It is unclear whether oral‐DDK performance is affected by different languages within a multilingual country. What this paper adds to existing knowledge: No ageing effect across real word versus nonword on oral‐DDK performance was observed among Malaysian‐Malay speakers, contrasting with current available literature that speech movements slow down as we age. Additionally, Malaysian‐Malay speakers have faster oral‐DDK rates than Malaysian‐Mandarin and Hebrew speakers across all stimuli. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?: Establishing normative data of different languages will enable speech‐language therapists to select the appropriate reference dataset based on the language mastery of these multilingual speakers.