Frontline polatuzumab vedotin for diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: A survey of clinician impressions. Issue 3 (16th June 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Major, Ajay; Cliff, Edward R. Scheffer; Ermann, Daniel A.; Durani, Urshila; Russler‐Germain, David A.
• Is Part Of: EJHaem. Volume 3:Issue 3(2022)
• Page Start: 930
• Page End: 935
• Publication Date: 2022-06-16
• Subjects: chemotherapy -- clinical trials -- lymphomas; Hematology -- Periodicals; 616.15
• DOI: 10.1002/jha2.505
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2688-6146

Abstract

Abstract: In the POLARIX trial, pola‐R‐CHP demonstrated improved progression‐free survival (PFS) compared to R‐CHOP in untreated intermediate‐ to high‐risk DLBCL. We surveyed practicing clinicians regarding their interpretation of POLARIX, including impressions of efficacy, safety, and cost. Of 174 respondents, most from academic centers (82%) in the United States (57%), 70% stated they would not replace R‐CHOP with pola‐R‐CHP due to insufficient PFS difference, lack of overall survival benefit, and excessive cost. Respondents not recommending pola‐R‐CHP expressed concerns about financial implications for both society and patients. We observed considerable heterogeneity in both study interpretation and plans for real‐world implementation of pola‐R‐CHP.