Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a five-year prospective, multicentre, survivorship study. (23rd August 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tran, Ton; McEwen, Peter; Peng, Yi; Trivett, Adrian; Steele, Robert; Donnelly, William; Clark, Gavin
• Is Part Of: Bone & joint open. Volume 3:Number 8(2022)
• Page Start: 656
• Page End: 665
• Publication Date: 2022-08-23
• Subjects: Knee -- Arthroplasty -- Replacement -- Kinematic -- Alignment -- total knee arthroplasty (TKA) -- Knees -- patella -- Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) -- valgus -- Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) -- joint line obliquities -- stiffness -- hip -- Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score; Orthopedic surgery -- Periodicals; Musculoskeletal system -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 617.47
• DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.38.BJO-2021-0214.R1
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2633-1462

Abstract

Abstract : Aims: The mid-term results of kinematic alignment (KA) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using image derived instrumentation (IDI) have not been reported in detail, and questions remain regarding ligamentous stability and revisions. This paper aims to address the following: 1) what is the distribution of alignment of KA TKAs using IDI; 2) is a TKA alignment category associated with increased risk of failure or poor patient outcomes; 3) does extending limb alignment lead to changes in soft-tissue laxity; and 4) what is the five-year survivorship and outcomes of KA TKA using IDI? Methods: A prospective, multicentre, trial enrolled 100 patients undergoing KA TKA using IDI, with follow-up to five years. Alignment measures were conducted pre- and postoperatively to assess constitutional alignment and final implant position. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of pain and function were also included. The Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Arthroplasty Registry was used to assess survivorship. Results: The postoperative HKA distribution varied from 9° varus to 11° valgus. All PROMs showed statistical improvements at one year (p < 0.001), with further improvements at five years for Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score symptoms (p = 0.041) and Forgotten Joint Score (p = 0.011). Correlation analysis showed no difference (p = 0.610) between the hip-knee-ankle and joint line congruence angle at one and five years. Sub-group analysis showed no difference in PROMs for patients placed within 3° of neutral compared to those placed > 3°. There were no revisions for tibial loosening; however, there were reports of a higher incidence of poor patella tracking and patellofemoral stiffness. Conclusion: PROMs were not impacted by postoperative alignment category. Ligamentous stability was maintained at five years with joint line obliquity. There were no revisions for tibial loosening despite a significant portion of tibiae placed in varus; however, KA executed with IDI resulted in a higher than anticipated rate of patella complications. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(8):656–665.