P11.73.B The diagnostic value of frame-based stereotactic biopsies in the age of precision oncology: A cross-sectional study. (5th September 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Alhalabi, O T; Sahm, F; Unterberg, A W; Jakobs, M
• Is Part Of: Neuro-oncology. Volume 24(2022)Supplement 2
• Page Start: ii75
• Page End: ii75
• Publication Date: 2022-09-05
• Subjects: Brain Neoplasms -- Periodicals; Brain -- Tumors -- Periodicals; Brain -- Cancer -- Periodicals; Nervous system -- Cancer -- Periodicals; 616.99481
• DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac174.262
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1522-8517

Abstract

Abstract: Background: For non-resectable, eloquent, multifocal and deep-seated intracranial lesions, stereotactic frame-based biopsies can deliver a finite amount of tissue for neuropathology studies. With the increasing role of molecular genetics in the diagnostics of intracranial tumors, sufficient tissue for sequencing studies is of paramount importance. This study explored the rate of successful diagnosis after stereotactic frame-based biopsies of intracranial lesions in a high-throughput neurooncology center Material and Methods: 145 consecutive patients undergoing frame-based stereotactic biopsies in 2020 and 2021 at our neurosurgical department were included in this retrospective analysis. Aspects of histological and molecular (methylomics, panel-sequencing) neuropathology analysis in addition to clinical and radiological variables were analyzed. Cases were classified as conclusive, likely-conclusive (sufficient diagnosis with non-satisfying sequencing information), and inconclusive neuropathological diagnosis. Results: Of 145 cases analyzed, astrocytic tumors were suspected in n= 94 (67%) of patients. In n= 122 cases (84%), a conclusive diagnosis was possible. For 14 (11%) cases, a likely-conclusive diagnosis was established Diagnoses comprised mainly WHO 4 glioblastomas (56%), WHO 3 gliomas (2%) in addition to WHO 1 and 2 gliomas (n=7, 5%), CNS lymphomas (n=23, 16%), inflammatory diseases (n=10, 7%) and normal or reactive tissue (n=4, 3%). Methylomics were pivotal in providing an integrated diagnosis in 30% of the cases (panel sequencing in 14%). In n= 12 (8%) of the cases further testing was hindered by insufficient tissue sample DNA. Only in 3 out of 12 cases this resulted in a final inconclusive diagnosis. Conclusion: Although stereotactic frame-based biopsies deliver a limited amount of tissue, they bear an excellent histopathological and molecular genetic diagnostic yield, with rare cases of missing molecular data or rarely insufficient diagnosis. Optimizing the number and representativeness of cell and DNA-rich stereotactic biopsy specimen might enhance the diagnostic and therapeutic potential of precision oncology even further.