AB0275 One-Year Treatment Patterns and Healthcare Resource Use Among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Newly Initiating Treatment with Biologic Dmards. (9th June 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- AB0275 One-Year Treatment Patterns and Healthcare Resource Use Among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Newly Initiating Treatment with Biologic Dmards. (9th June 2015)
- Main Title:
- AB0275 One-Year Treatment Patterns and Healthcare Resource Use Among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Newly Initiating Treatment with Biologic Dmards
- Authors:
- Harnett, J.
Gerber, R.
Gruben, D.
Wiederkehr, D.
Mahgoub, E.Y.
Wallenstein, G.
Koenig, A. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) are used to treat patients (pts) with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Pts may experience clinical benefits from treatment with bDMARDs alone or with a conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD). Objectives: To assess treatment patterns and healthcare resource use (HCRU) after prescription/administration of a bDMARD alone or with a csDMARD. Methods: In this retrospective cohort analysis, pts aged ≥18 years (yrs) with an RA diagnosis (ICD9: 714.xx) who were prescribed/administered a DMARD (2007–2011) were selected from de-identified US electronic health records (EHR; Humedica). Index date was date of first prescription/administration for a bDMARD (adalimumab, certolizumab, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, rituximab, anakinra, tocilizumab). Pts did not receive bDMARDs for ≥6 months pre-index and were followed for ≥1 yr post-index. Pts were classified by index biologic monotherapy (Bmono) or combination therapy with bDMARD and csDMARD (B+CScombo; based on methotrexate, leflunomide, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine at index). Regression analyses for switch (new bDMARD/csDMARD prescription/administration and no index drug for ≥120 days) and RA-related costs were assessed controlling for differences in pt demographics/characteristics. RA-related costs were derived from a pt subset with linked Optum claims data and applied to RA visits and pharmacy use in EHR. Results: Of 2119 pts initiating a bDMARD, 70.6% received BmonoAbstract : Background: Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) are used to treat patients (pts) with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Pts may experience clinical benefits from treatment with bDMARDs alone or with a conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD). Objectives: To assess treatment patterns and healthcare resource use (HCRU) after prescription/administration of a bDMARD alone or with a csDMARD. Methods: In this retrospective cohort analysis, pts aged ≥18 years (yrs) with an RA diagnosis (ICD9: 714.xx) who were prescribed/administered a DMARD (2007–2011) were selected from de-identified US electronic health records (EHR; Humedica). Index date was date of first prescription/administration for a bDMARD (adalimumab, certolizumab, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, rituximab, anakinra, tocilizumab). Pts did not receive bDMARDs for ≥6 months pre-index and were followed for ≥1 yr post-index. Pts were classified by index biologic monotherapy (Bmono) or combination therapy with bDMARD and csDMARD (B+CScombo; based on methotrexate, leflunomide, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine at index). Regression analyses for switch (new bDMARD/csDMARD prescription/administration and no index drug for ≥120 days) and RA-related costs were assessed controlling for differences in pt demographics/characteristics. RA-related costs were derived from a pt subset with linked Optum claims data and applied to RA visits and pharmacy use in EHR. Results: Of 2119 pts initiating a bDMARD, 70.6% received Bmono and 29.1% received B+CScombo; 0.2% had ≥2 biologics. Pt characteristics and treatment patterns are presented in Table 1 . Mean age and percentage of females were similar for Bmono and B+CScombo pts. Compared with B+CScombo pts, Bmono pts were more likely to be treated by a rheumatologist, had a higher Deyo-Charlson Co-morbidity Index score and were more likely to have cardiovascular disease, hyperlipidaemia, hypertension and renal disease. Most Bmono and B+CScombo pts were prescribed a TNF inhibitor (TNFi). During 1-yr follow-up (FU), B+CScombo pts were less likely to switch index regimen vs Bmono pts (OR 0.37; 95% CI 0.27, 0.51; p<0.0001). More than one-third of Bmono pts switched index regimen, with most switching to a csDMARD. A small proportion of B+CScombo pts switched index regimen with more than half switching the bDMARD of the B+CScombo regimen and the remainder switching the csDMARD of the B+CScombo regimen. Compared with Bmono pts, B+CScombo pts had lower mean RA-related office and outpatient visits but more prescriptions. Adjusted total RA-related costs were 30% lower for Bmono vs B+CScombo pts. Conclusions: In this analysis of EHR data characterising bDMARD prescriptions/administrations in pts with RA, 70.6% received Bmono, and had a greater prevalence of co-morbidities and were more likely to be treated by a rheumatologist vs B+CScombo pts. B+CScombo pts were less likely to switch index regimen in 1-yr of FU and had lower RA-related medical HCRU but greater total costs vs Bmono pts. High prevalence of Bmono use may be due to a stricter concomitant csDMARD definition or the data source, which included specialties other than rheumatology. Acknowledgements: This study was sponsored by Pfizer Inc. Editorial Support was provided by Karen Irving at Complete Medical Communications and funded by Pfizer Inc. Disclosure of Interest: J. Harnett Shareholder of: Pfizer Inc., Employee of: Pfizer Inc., R. Gerber Shareholder of: Pfizer Inc., Employee of: Pfizer Inc., D. Gruben Shareholder of: Pfizer Inc., Employee of: Pfizer Inc., D. Wiederkehr Shareholder of: Pfizer Inc., Employee of: Pfizer Inc., E. Mahgoub Shareholder of: Pfizer Inc., Employee of: Pfizer Inc., G. Wallenstein Shareholder of: Pfizer Inc., Employee of: Pfizer Inc., A. Koenig Shareholder of: Pfizer Inc., Employee of: Pfizer Inc. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Annals of the rheumatic diseases. Volume 74(2015)Supplement 2
- Journal:
- Annals of the rheumatic diseases
- Issue:
- Volume 74(2015)Supplement 2
- Issue Display:
- Volume 74, Issue 2 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 74
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0074-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 984
- Page End:
- 984
- Publication Date:
- 2015-06-09
- Subjects:
- Rheumatism -- Periodicals
616.723005 - Journal URLs:
- http://ard.bmjjournals.com/ ↗
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/tocrender.fcgi?journal=149&action=archive ↗
http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://gateway.ovid.com/server3/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&D=ovft&PAGE=titles&SEARCH=annals+of+the+rheumatic+diseases.tj&NEWS=N ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-eular.3650 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0003-4967
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23177.xml