Implications of the concept of minimal risk in research on informed choice in clinical practice. Issue 10 (24th June 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Implications of the concept of minimal risk in research on informed choice in clinical practice. Issue 10 (24th June 2015)
- Main Title:
- Implications of the concept of minimal risk in research on informed choice in clinical practice
- Authors:
- Wada, Kyoko
Nisker, Jeff - Abstract:
- Abstract : The concept of a minimal risk threshold in research, beneath which exception to informed consent and ethics review processes may occur, has been codified for over 30 years in many national research regulations and by the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. Although minimal risk in research constitutes one of the criteria for allowing waiver of informed consent or modification to the consent process and a large body of literature exists, discussion of a minimal risk threshold in clinical practice has not occurred. One reason for lack of discussion may be that implicit consent is accepted for a wide range of routine clinical practices. Extending the role of minimal risk in research to clinical practice might assist clinicians in identifying circumstances for which implicit consent is indeed sufficient and circumstances in which it is not. Further, concepts from minimal risk in research might assist clinicians regarding when information provision in health promotion is required. We begin by reviewing concepts in both minimal risk in research and informed choice in clinical practice. We then explore how a clinical minimal risk concept may clarify recommendations for information provision in clinical practice and support the patient's informed choice regarding therapeutic and diagnostic procedures and also health promotion. Given that clinical practice involves a broad scope of health information, professional practice guidelines on informationAbstract : The concept of a minimal risk threshold in research, beneath which exception to informed consent and ethics review processes may occur, has been codified for over 30 years in many national research regulations and by the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. Although minimal risk in research constitutes one of the criteria for allowing waiver of informed consent or modification to the consent process and a large body of literature exists, discussion of a minimal risk threshold in clinical practice has not occurred. One reason for lack of discussion may be that implicit consent is accepted for a wide range of routine clinical practices. Extending the role of minimal risk in research to clinical practice might assist clinicians in identifying circumstances for which implicit consent is indeed sufficient and circumstances in which it is not. Further, concepts from minimal risk in research might assist clinicians regarding when information provision in health promotion is required. We begin by reviewing concepts in both minimal risk in research and informed choice in clinical practice. We then explore how a clinical minimal risk concept may clarify recommendations for information provision in clinical practice and support the patient's informed choice regarding therapeutic and diagnostic procedures and also health promotion. Given that clinical practice involves a broad scope of health information, professional practice guidelines on information provision based on the application of the minimal risk threshold in research could be developed to guide clinicians in what information must be provided to their patients. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of medical ethics. Volume 41:Issue 10(2015)
- Journal:
- Journal of medical ethics
- Issue:
- Volume 41:Issue 10(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 41, Issue 10 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 41
- Issue:
- 10
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0041-0010-0000
- Page Start:
- 804
- Page End:
- 808
- Publication Date:
- 2015-06-24
- Subjects:
- Informed Consent
Medical ethics -- Periodicals
174.2 - Journal URLs:
- http://jme.bmj.com/ ↗
http://www.jstor.org/journals/03066800.html ↗
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/journals/168/ ↗
http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/medethics-2014-102231 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0306-6800
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23181.xml