Exenatide extended release in patients with type 1 diabetes with and without residual insulin production. Issue 11 (29th July 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Herold, Kevan C.; Reynolds, Jesse; Dziura, James; Baidal, David; Gaglia, Jason; Gitelman, Stephen E.; Gottlieb, Peter A.; Marks, Jennifer; Philipson, Louis H.; Pop‐Busui, Rodica; Weinstock, Ruth S.
• Is Part Of: Diabetes, obesity & metabolism. Volume 22:Issue 11(2020)
• Page Start: 2045
• Page End: 2054
• Publication Date: 2020-07-29
• Subjects: adjunctive therapy -- C‐peptide -- glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist -- type 1 diabetes; Diabetes -- Periodicals; Obesity -- Periodicals; Metabolism -- Disorders -- Periodicals; Clinical pharmacology -- Periodicals; 616.462
• DOI: 10.1111/dom.14121
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1462-8902

Abstract

Abstract: Aims: To test whether a long‐acting GLP‐1 receptor agonist would improve glucose control in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and to determine whether the presence of residual beta cell function would affect the response. In addition, we sought to determine whether the drug would affect beta cell function. Methods: We performed a randomized placebo‐controlled trial of exenatide extended release (ER) in participants with T1D with and without detectable levels of C‐peptide. Seventy‐nine participants were randomized to exenatide ER 2 mcg weekly, or placebo, stratified by the presence or absence of detectable C‐peptide levels. The primary outcome was the difference in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels at 24 weeks. Participants were followed for another 6 months off study drug. Results: At week 24, the time of the primary outcome, the least squares (LS) mean HbA1c level was 7.76% (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.42, 8.10) in the exenatide ER group versus 8.0% (95% CI 7.64, 8.35) in the placebo group ( P = 0.08). At week 12 the LS mean HbA1c levels were 7.71% (95% CI 7.37, 8.05) in the exenatide ER group versus 8.05% (95% CI 7.7, 8.4) in the placebo group ( P = 0.01). The improvement at week 12 was driven mainly by those with detectable levels of C‐peptide. Those treated with exenatide ER lost weight at 12 and 24 weeks compared to those treated with placebo ( P <0.001 and P = 0.007). The total insulin dose was lower, but not when corrected for body weight, and was not affected by residual insulin production. Adverse events were more frequent with exenatide ER, but hypoglycaemia was not increased. Conclusion: Treatment with exenatide ER may have short‐term benefits in some individuals with T1D who are overweight or who have detectable levels of C‐peptide, but short‐term improvements were not sustained.