Comparative performance of orangutans (Pongo spp.), gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla), and drills (Mandrillus leucophaeus), in an ephemeral foraging task. Issue 1 (1st November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Prétôt, Laurent; Mickelberg, Jennifer; Carrigan, Jodi; Stoinski, Tara; Bshary, Redouan; Brosnan, Sarah F.
• Is Part Of: American journal of primatology. Volume 83:Issue 1(2021)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2020-11-01
• Subjects: comparative research -- Gorilla gorilla gorilla -- Mandrillus leucophaeus -- Pongo spp.; Primates -- Periodicals; Primates -- Périodiques; 599.8
• DOI: 10.1002/ajp.23212
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0275-2565

Abstract

Abstract: A goal of the comparative approach is to test a variety of species on the same task. Here, we examined whether the factors that helped capuchin monkeys improve their performance in a dichotomous choice task would generalize to three other primate species: orangutans, gorillas, and drill monkeys. In this task, subjects have access to two options, each resulting in an identical food, but one (the ephemeral option) is only available if it is chosen first, whereas the other one (the permanent option) is always available. Therefore, the food‐maximizing solution is to choose the ephemeral option first, followed by the permanent option for an additional reward. On the original version (plate task), the options were discriminated by the color and pattern of the plates holding the food, while on two subsequent versions we used altered cues that we predicted would improve performance: (1) the color of the foods themselves (color task), which we hypothesized was relevant to primates, who choose foods rather than substrates on which foods are found when foraging, and (2) patterned cups covering the foods (cup task), which we hypothesized would help primates avoid the prepotent response associated with visible food. Like capuchins, all three species initially failed to solve the plate task. However, while orangutans improved their performance from the plate to the color task, they did not for the cup task, and only a few gorillas and no drills succeeded in either task. Unfortunately, our ability to interpret these data was obscured by differences in the subjects' level of experience with cognitive testing and practical constraints that precluded the use of completely identical procedures across species. Nonetheless, we consider what these results can tell us, and discuss the value of conducting studies across multiple sites despite unavoidable differences. Abstract : Pairs of stimuli (named 1 and 2) used in the plate, color, and cup tasks. Capuchins' and orangutans' plates in the plate task are from Salwiczek et al. (2012); capuchins' plates in the color task and the cup task are from Prétôt et al. (2016b).