Association between clinical specialty setting and disease management in patients with psoriatic arthritis: results from LOOP, a cross‐sectional, multi‐country, observational study. (6th March 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Association between clinical specialty setting and disease management in patients with psoriatic arthritis: results from LOOP, a cross‐sectional, multi‐country, observational study. (6th March 2020)
- Main Title:
- Association between clinical specialty setting and disease management in patients with psoriatic arthritis: results from LOOP, a cross‐sectional, multi‐country, observational study
- Authors:
- Boehncke, W.H.
Horváth, R.
Dalkiliç, E.
Lima, S.A.L.
Okada, M.
Hojnik, M.
Ganz, F.
Lubrano, E. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic and debilitating disease that can be managed by different clinical specialists. Objectives: The objective of the LOOP study was to evaluate the impact of clinical specialty setting on the time to diagnosis and treatment of patients with PsA. Clinical disease activity and disease burden were also compared between clinical settings. Methods: LOOP was a cross‐sectional, multicentre, observational study conducted in 17 countries in Western and Eastern Europe, the Middle East, Latin America and Asia. Adult patients (≥18 years) with a suspected or established diagnosis of PsA who were routinely visiting a rheumatologist, dermatologist or non‐rheumatology/non‐dermatology physician were enrolled. All patients were assessed by both a rheumatologist and a dermatologist. Results: Of 1483 enrolled patients, a total of 1273 had a confirmed diagnosis of PsA. There was no significant difference in the median time from onset of inflammatory musculoskeletal symptoms to PsA diagnosis between patients enrolled by rheumatologists and dermatologists (6.0 vs. 3.9 months). However, the median time from diagnosis to first treatment with a conventional synthetic disease‐modifying anti‐rheumatic drug (csDMARD) was significantly shorter in the rheumatology setting compared with the dermatology setting (0 vs. 2.0 months; P < 0.001). In addition, disease activity was significantly higher in the dermatology setting compared with theAbstract: Background: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic and debilitating disease that can be managed by different clinical specialists. Objectives: The objective of the LOOP study was to evaluate the impact of clinical specialty setting on the time to diagnosis and treatment of patients with PsA. Clinical disease activity and disease burden were also compared between clinical settings. Methods: LOOP was a cross‐sectional, multicentre, observational study conducted in 17 countries in Western and Eastern Europe, the Middle East, Latin America and Asia. Adult patients (≥18 years) with a suspected or established diagnosis of PsA who were routinely visiting a rheumatologist, dermatologist or non‐rheumatology/non‐dermatology physician were enrolled. All patients were assessed by both a rheumatologist and a dermatologist. Results: Of 1483 enrolled patients, a total of 1273 had a confirmed diagnosis of PsA. There was no significant difference in the median time from onset of inflammatory musculoskeletal symptoms to PsA diagnosis between patients enrolled by rheumatologists and dermatologists (6.0 vs. 3.9 months). However, the median time from diagnosis to first treatment with a conventional synthetic disease‐modifying anti‐rheumatic drug (csDMARD) was significantly shorter in the rheumatology setting compared with the dermatology setting (0 vs. 2.0 months; P < 0.001). In addition, disease activity was significantly higher in the dermatology setting compared with the rheumatology setting. Conclusions: Differences in the management and clinical status of patients with PsA were observed between the rheumatology and dermatology settings. Importantly, median time from diagnosis to first csDMARD was significantly shorter in the rheumatology setting, and patients in the dermatology setting had higher disease activity. These data show the importance of improved collaboration between rheumatologists and dermatologists. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. Volume 34:Number 9(2020)
- Journal:
- Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
- Issue:
- Volume 34:Number 9(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 34, Issue 9 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 34
- Issue:
- 9
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0034-0009-0000
- Page Start:
- 2035
- Page End:
- 2043
- Publication Date:
- 2020-03-06
- Subjects:
- Dermatology -- Periodicals
Sexually transmitted diseases -- Periodicals
616.5 - Journal URLs:
- https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14683083 ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/member/institutions/issuelist.asp?journal=jdv ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09269959 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=0926-9959;screen=info;ECOIP ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/loi/jdv ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/jdv.16251 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0926-9959
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4741.624000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23190.xml