A comparative evaluation of three CuCl cycles for hydrogen production. (29th March 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ishaq, H.; Dincer, I.
• Is Part Of: International journal of hydrogen energy. Volume 44:Number 16(2019)
• Page Start: 7958
• Page End: 7968
• Publication Date: 2019-03-29
• Subjects: Copper-chlorine cycle -- Hydrogen production -- Thermochemical water splitting -- Energy -- Exergy -- Efficiency; Hydrogen as fuel -- Periodicals; Hydrogène (Combustible) -- Périodiques; Hydrogen as fuel; Periodicals; 665.81
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.249
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0360-3199

Abstract

Abstract: The thermochemical CuCl cycle has received greater attention by numerous researchers during the past decade as a promising hydrogen production method because of some operational advantages. The present paper analyzes three different configurations of the CuCl thermochemical cycle, namely three, four and five step ones thermodynamically. Some comparative parametric studies are conducted in order to investigate the overall energy and exergy efficiencies of the cycles considered. The Aspen plus is the software tool employed for the modeling and simulation of the cycles. The energy and exergy efficiencies of the five-step CuCl cycle are found to be 38.8% and 70.2% while the three-step CuCl cycle has an energy efficiency of 39.6% and an exergy efficiency of 68.1%, respectively. On the other hand, the four-step CuCl cycle provides the highest energy and exergy efficiencies of 41.9% and 75.7%. A parametric study is also conducted to investigate the effect of varying ambient temperature on the exergy efficiencies of all three cycles. The present study results further reveal that the cycle performance can be enhanced by improving the thermal management and reducing the exergy destructions. Highlights: Comparative assessment of the three different CuCl cycles for hydrogen production. Numerous factors for heat and work requirements, operating conditions and exergy destructions are considered for analysis. Aspen plus software tool is employed for the simulations of the cycles. Four-step CuCl cycle offers the highest energy and exergy efficiencies.