The effect of DNA recovery on the subsequent quality of latent fingermarks: A pseudo-operational trial. (February 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The effect of DNA recovery on the subsequent quality of latent fingermarks: A pseudo-operational trial. (February 2020)
- Main Title:
- The effect of DNA recovery on the subsequent quality of latent fingermarks: A pseudo-operational trial
- Authors:
- Fieldhouse, S.
Parsons, R.
Bleay, S.
Walton-Williams, L. - Abstract:
- Highlights: A pseudo-operational trial of gel DNA recovery on latent fingermark quality. User variation effects on fingermarks were examined. Fingermarks deemed 'suitable for identification' were observed post gel lifting. Surface type was a greater influence on fingermark quality than DNA recovery. Low weight and instantaneous gel application was least detrimental to marks. Abstract: The recovery of fingermarks and DNA from the same location at a crime scene can be problematic because of contamination issues associated with powdering or laboratory-based visualisation processes and/or the perceived destructive impact of commonly employed 'swabbing' approaches to DNA recovery. Previous research in a controlled environment demonstrated that it was possible to recover DNA and latent fingermarks from the same location on various substrates when an adhesive approach to DNA recovery was used. The aim of this research was to conduct a pseudo-operational trial into the dual recovery of DNA and fingermarks using gel lifters for DNA recovery. Participants were asked to voluntarily and anonymously donate a wide variety of porous and non-porous substrates post handling. No instruction as to fingermark deposition nor environmental storage was provided. BVDA gel lifters were applied to the substrates to replicate DNA recovery followed by the application of fingermark visualisation processes. The number and quality of the fingermarks was established using a grading approach. ApplicationHighlights: A pseudo-operational trial of gel DNA recovery on latent fingermark quality. User variation effects on fingermarks were examined. Fingermarks deemed 'suitable for identification' were observed post gel lifting. Surface type was a greater influence on fingermark quality than DNA recovery. Low weight and instantaneous gel application was least detrimental to marks. Abstract: The recovery of fingermarks and DNA from the same location at a crime scene can be problematic because of contamination issues associated with powdering or laboratory-based visualisation processes and/or the perceived destructive impact of commonly employed 'swabbing' approaches to DNA recovery. Previous research in a controlled environment demonstrated that it was possible to recover DNA and latent fingermarks from the same location on various substrates when an adhesive approach to DNA recovery was used. The aim of this research was to conduct a pseudo-operational trial into the dual recovery of DNA and fingermarks using gel lifters for DNA recovery. Participants were asked to voluntarily and anonymously donate a wide variety of porous and non-porous substrates post handling. No instruction as to fingermark deposition nor environmental storage was provided. BVDA gel lifters were applied to the substrates to replicate DNA recovery followed by the application of fingermark visualisation processes. The number and quality of the fingermarks was established using a grading approach. Application factors were also investigated to consider the effects of user variation. The results demonstrated that it was possible to recover DNA and fingermarks considered to be capable of supporting an identification. Fingermark quality post lifting was dependant on the substrates used. The weight applied to the gel during its application was a lesser contributing factor than the duration of its contact with the surface. There was a greater chance of leaving the fingermarks unaltered with the application of a low weight and instantaneous retraction. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Forensic science international. Volume 307(2020)
- Journal:
- Forensic science international
- Issue:
- Volume 307(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 307, Issue 2020 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 307
- Issue:
- 2020
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0307-2020-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-02
- Subjects:
- Evidence -- DNA -- Fingermarks -- Crime scene -- Contamination -- Innovation
Medical jurisprudence -- Periodicals
Chemistry, Forensic -- Periodicals
Forensic Medicine -- Periodicals
Médecine légale -- Périodiques
Chimie légale -- Périodiques
Gerechtelijke geneeskunde
Gerechtelijke chemie
Gerechtelijke psychiatrie
Chemistry, Forensic
Medical jurisprudence
Electronic journals
Periodicals
Electronic journals
614.1 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/03790738 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/03790738 ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03790738 ↗
http://infotrac.galegroup.com/itw/infomark/1/1/1/purl=rc18_EAIM_0__jn+%22Forensic+Science+International%22?sw_aep=stand ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/homepage/elecserv.htt ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.110076 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0379-0738
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3987.764000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23142.xml