Flotation of monazite in the presence of calcite part II: Enhanced separation performance using sodium silicate and EDTA. (October 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zhang, Wencai; Honaker, Rick Q.
• Is Part Of: Minerals engineering. Volume 127(2018)
• Page Start: 318
• Page End: 328
• Publication Date: 2018-10
• Subjects: Flotation -- Monazite -- Calcite -- Sodium silicate -- Sodium hexametaphosphate -- Citric acid -- EDTA; Mines and mineral resources -- Periodicals; Ressources minérales -- Périodiques; Mines and mineral resources; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 622
• DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2018.01.042
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0892-6875

Abstract

Highlights: Sodium silicate and SHMP selectively depressed calcite in single mineral tests. Monazite floatability was suppressed by the depressants in a mixed system. Suppression was due to co-adsorption of depressants and calcium species. Citric acid and EDTA efficiently removed calcium ions from monazite surfaces. CaCO3(aq) and CaHCO3 − interact with Si(OH)4 and SiO(OH)3 − on monazite surfaces. Abstract: Selective depression of calcite in a monazite-calcite flotation system was systematically studied using micro-flotation and electrokinetic tests as well as X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) characterization and solution chemistry calculations. Monazite was found to be depressed by both sodium silicate and sodium hexametaphosphate when calcium ions appeared in solution. It was hypothesized that co-adsorption of calcium species (CaHCO3 + and CaCO3(aq) ) and Si ( OH ) 4 as well as SiO ( OH ) 3 - via hydrogen bonding formed a compact layer over the monazite surface, thereby reducing octanohydroxamic acid adsorption by steric hindrance. The use of citric acid or EDTA formed soluble chelates (e.g. CaCit − and CaEdta 2− ) with the calcium ions which negated the flotation suppression effect. An XPS study indicated that both EDTA and citric acid chemically adsorbed on the monazite surface, while the adsorption on the calcite surface was achieved mainly through hydrogen bonding. EDTA was more effective than citric acid due to two reasons: (i) citric acid itself presented stronger depression effects and (ii) citric acid has weaker chelating properties for calcium. Using 2.5 × 10 −4 M octanohydroxamic acid, 0.05 g/L sodium silicate and 6 × 10 −5 M EDTA, monazite recovery of more than 90% was achieved while recovering only 20% of the calcite.