Lung Cancer Diagnosed Through Screening, Lung Nodule, and Neither Program: A Prospective Observational Study of the Detecting Early Lung Cancer (DELUGE) in the Mississippi Delta Cohort. Issue 19 (1st July 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Lung Cancer Diagnosed Through Screening, Lung Nodule, and Neither Program: A Prospective Observational Study of the Detecting Early Lung Cancer (DELUGE) in the Mississippi Delta Cohort. Issue 19 (1st July 2022)
- Main Title:
- Lung Cancer Diagnosed Through Screening, Lung Nodule, and Neither Program: A Prospective Observational Study of the Detecting Early Lung Cancer (DELUGE) in the Mississippi Delta Cohort
- Authors:
- Osarogiagbon, Raymond U.
Liao, Wei
Faris, Nicholas R.
Meadows-Taylor, Meghan
Fehnel, Carrie
Lane, Jordan
Williams, Sara C.
Patel, Anita A.
Akinbobola, Olawale A.
Pacheco, Alicia
Epperson, Amanda
Luttrell, Joy
McCoy, Denise
McHugh, Laura
Signore, Raymond
Bishop, Anna M.
Tonkin, Keith
Optican, Robert
Wright, Jeffrey
Robbins, Todd
Ray, Meredith A.
Smeltzer, Matthew P. - Abstract:
- Abstract : PURPOSE: Lung cancer screening saves lives, but implementation is challenging. We evaluated two approaches to early lung cancer detection—low-dose computed tomography screening (LDCT) and program-based management of incidentally detected lung nodules. METHODS: A prospective observational study enrolled patients in the early detection programs. For context, we compared them with patients managed in a Multidisciplinary Care Program. We compared clinical stage distribution, surgical resection rates, 3- and 5-year survival rates, and eligibility for LDCT screening of patients diagnosed with lung cancer. RESULTS: From 2015 to May 2021, 22, 886 patients were enrolled: 5, 659 in LDCT, 15, 461 in Lung Nodule, and 1, 766 in Multidisciplinary Care. Of 150, 698, and 1, 010 patients diagnosed with lung cancer in the respective programs, 61%, 60%, and 44% were diagnosed at clinical stage I or II, whereas 19%, 20%, and 29% were stage IV ( P = .0005); 47%, 42%, and 32% had curative-intent surgery ( P < .0001); aggregate 3-year overall survival rates were 80% (95% CI, 73 to 88) versus 64% (60 to 68) versus 49% (46 to 53); 5-year overall survival rates were 76% (67 to 87) versus 60% (56 to 65) versus 44% (40 to 48), respectively. Only 46% of 1, 858 patients with lung cancer would have been deemed eligible for LDCT by US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) 2013 criteria, and 54% by 2021 criteria. Even if all eligible patients by USPSTF 2021 criteria had been enrolled into LDCT,Abstract : PURPOSE: Lung cancer screening saves lives, but implementation is challenging. We evaluated two approaches to early lung cancer detection—low-dose computed tomography screening (LDCT) and program-based management of incidentally detected lung nodules. METHODS: A prospective observational study enrolled patients in the early detection programs. For context, we compared them with patients managed in a Multidisciplinary Care Program. We compared clinical stage distribution, surgical resection rates, 3- and 5-year survival rates, and eligibility for LDCT screening of patients diagnosed with lung cancer. RESULTS: From 2015 to May 2021, 22, 886 patients were enrolled: 5, 659 in LDCT, 15, 461 in Lung Nodule, and 1, 766 in Multidisciplinary Care. Of 150, 698, and 1, 010 patients diagnosed with lung cancer in the respective programs, 61%, 60%, and 44% were diagnosed at clinical stage I or II, whereas 19%, 20%, and 29% were stage IV ( P = .0005); 47%, 42%, and 32% had curative-intent surgery ( P < .0001); aggregate 3-year overall survival rates were 80% (95% CI, 73 to 88) versus 64% (60 to 68) versus 49% (46 to 53); 5-year overall survival rates were 76% (67 to 87) versus 60% (56 to 65) versus 44% (40 to 48), respectively. Only 46% of 1, 858 patients with lung cancer would have been deemed eligible for LDCT by US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) 2013 criteria, and 54% by 2021 criteria. Even if all eligible patients by USPSTF 2021 criteria had been enrolled into LDCT, the Nodule Program would have detected 20% of the stage I-II lung cancer in the entire cohort. CONCLUSION: LDCT and Lung Nodule Programs are complementary, expanding access to early lung cancer detection and curative treatment to different-risk populations. Implementing Lung Nodule Programs may alleviate emerging disparities in access to early lung cancer detection. Abstract : Lung Nodule Program complements LDCT lung cancer screening, expands access, and reduces disparities. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of clinical oncology. Volume 40:Issue 19(2022)
- Journal:
- Journal of clinical oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 40:Issue 19(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 40, Issue 19 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 40
- Issue:
- 19
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0040-0019-0000
- Page Start:
- 2094
- Page End:
- 2105
- Publication Date:
- 2022-07-01
- Subjects:
- Oncology -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Periodicals
Oncology
Medical Oncology
Cancérologie -- Périodiques
Cancer -- Périodiques
Cancérologie
Cancer
Oncology
Oncologia
Càncer
Periodicals
616.994 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.jco.org/ ↗
http://jco.ascopubs.org/ ↗
http://journals.lww.com/pages/default.aspx ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1200/JCO.21.02496 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0732-183X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23158.xml