Towards network governance? The case of emission trading in Guangdong, China. (June 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lo, Alex Y; Mai, Lindsay Qianqing; Lee, Anna Ka-yin; Francesch-Huidobro, Maria; Pei, Qing; Cong, Ren; Chen, Kang
• Is Part Of: Land use policy. Volume 75(2018)
• Page Start: 538
• Page End: 548
• Publication Date: 2018-06
• Subjects: Climate change policy -- Governance -- Network -- Capacity building -- Emissions trading -- China; Land use -- Periodicals; Land use -- Government policy -- Periodicals; Sol, Utilisation du -- Périodiques; Sol, Utilisation du -- Politique gouvernementale -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 333.7305
• DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.021
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0264-8377

Abstract

Highlights: This study identifies the challenges of governing domestic cap-and-trade systems. It analyses a governance network supporting carbon market development in Guangdong. This network has demonstrated some network functions, mainly, capacity building. But lacks reflexivity and power sharing in decision-making and steering. Its role in advancing governance of emission trading remains uncertain. Abstract: The article explores issues about governing domestic cap-and-trade systems for mitigating carbon emissions. The implementation of these systems in China warrants investigation, because they could restructure the governing relationships between public and private actors and create conditions for networked forms of governance. The study identifies key challenges presented by an emerging network supporting carbon market development in Guangdong. It provides an assessment of network functioning in terms of capacity building, actor engagement, and rule setting and implementation. The research is based on semi-structured interviews with non-state network constituents, coupled with a review of policy development. We find that this emerging network has demonstrated some of the key network functions, mainly capacity building, and can be seen as a partial substitute for the state in this area. However, more could be done to strengthen participation and enable power sharing in steering and coordinating the decision-making process. The key features of reflexivity and power sharing in decision-making and steering are not clearly represented, leading to a conclusion that this governance network remains underdeveloped. This article contributes to the debates on the contested role of cap-and-trade systems in displacing hierarchical approaches and empowering a wider range of actors.