Breast and colorectal cancer recurrence and progression captured by five U.S. population-based registries: Findings from National Program of Cancer Registries patient-centered outcome research. (February 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Breast and colorectal cancer recurrence and progression captured by five U.S. population-based registries: Findings from National Program of Cancer Registries patient-centered outcome research. (February 2020)
- Main Title:
- Breast and colorectal cancer recurrence and progression captured by five U.S. population-based registries: Findings from National Program of Cancer Registries patient-centered outcome research
- Authors:
- Thompson, Trevor D.
Pollack, Lori A.
Johnson, Christopher J.
Wu, Xiao-Cheng
Rees, Judy R.
Hsieh, Mei-Chin
Rycroft, Randi
Culp, MaryBeth
Wilson, Reda
Wu, Manxia
Zhang, Kevin
Benard, Vicki - Abstract:
- Highlights: Standards for defining cancer recurrence do not exist and data are limited. Disease-free/recurrence data collection feasible but costly and in need of data standards. We show an approach to estimate population-based cancer recurrence and recurrence-free survival. If never disease-free, capture of progression was elusive but less critical due to poor survival. Abstract: Objectives: Cancer recurrence is a meaningful patient outcome that is not captured in population-based cancer surveillance. This project supported National Program of Cancer Registries central cancer registries in five U.S. states to determine the disease course of all breast and colorectal cancer cases. The aims were to assess the feasibility of capturing disease-free (DF) status and subsequent cancer outcomes and to explore analytic approaches for future studies. Methods: Data were obtained on 11, 769 breast and 6033 colorectal cancer cancers diagnosed in 2011. Registry-trained abstractors reviewed medical records from multiple sources for up to 60 months to determine documented DF status, recurrence, progression and residual disease. We described the occurrence of these patient-centered outcomes along with analytic considerations when determining time-to-event outcomes and recurrence-free survival. Results: Disease-free status was determined on all but 3.8 % of cancer cases. Among 14, 458 cases that became DF, 6.1 % of breast and 13.0 % of colorectal cancer cases had a documented recurrence.Highlights: Standards for defining cancer recurrence do not exist and data are limited. Disease-free/recurrence data collection feasible but costly and in need of data standards. We show an approach to estimate population-based cancer recurrence and recurrence-free survival. If never disease-free, capture of progression was elusive but less critical due to poor survival. Abstract: Objectives: Cancer recurrence is a meaningful patient outcome that is not captured in population-based cancer surveillance. This project supported National Program of Cancer Registries central cancer registries in five U.S. states to determine the disease course of all breast and colorectal cancer cases. The aims were to assess the feasibility of capturing disease-free (DF) status and subsequent cancer outcomes and to explore analytic approaches for future studies. Methods: Data were obtained on 11, 769 breast and 6033 colorectal cancer cancers diagnosed in 2011. Registry-trained abstractors reviewed medical records from multiple sources for up to 60 months to determine documented DF status, recurrence, progression and residual disease. We described the occurrence of these patient-centered outcomes along with analytic considerations when determining time-to-event outcomes and recurrence-free survival. Results: Disease-free status was determined on all but 3.8 % of cancer cases. Among 14, 458 cases that became DF, 6.1 % of breast and 13.0 % of colorectal cancer cases had a documented recurrence. Recurrence-free survival varied by stage; for stage II-III cancers at 48 months, 83.2 % of female breast and 69.2 % of colorectal cancer patients were alive without recurrence. The ability to distinguish between progression and residual disease among never disease-free patients limited our ability to examine progression as an outcome. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that population-based registries given intense support and resources can capture recurrence and offer a generalizable picture of cancer outcomes. Further work on refining definitions, sampling strategies, and novel approaches to capture recurrence could advance the ability of a national cancer surveillance system to contribute to patient-centered outcomes research. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Cancer epidemiology. Volume 64(2020:Feb.)
- Journal:
- Cancer epidemiology
- Issue:
- Volume 64(2020:Feb.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 64 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 64
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0064-0000-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-02
- Subjects:
- AFU Active follow-up -- CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention -- DF Disease-free -- NPCR National Programs of Cancer Registries -- PCOR Patient-centered cancer research
Breast cancer -- Colon cancer -- Recurrence -- National Program of Cancer Registries
Cancer -- Epidemiology -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Prevention -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Diagnosis -- Periodicals
Carcinogenesis -- Periodicals
616.994005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/18777821 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.canep.2019.101653 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1877-7821
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3046.477910
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23153.xml