BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine Effectiveness Given Confirmed Exposure: Analysis of Household Members of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients. (24th November 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine Effectiveness Given Confirmed Exposure: Analysis of Household Members of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients. (24th November 2021)
- Main Title:
- BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine Effectiveness Given Confirmed Exposure: Analysis of Household Members of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients
- Authors:
- Gazit, Sivan
Mizrahi, Barak
Kalkstein, Nir
Neuberger, Ami
Peretz, Asaf
Mizrahi-Reuveni, Miri
Ben-Tov, Amir
Patalon, Tal - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Although BNT162b2 vaccine-efficacy analyses have been published, the effectiveness of the vaccine in preventing coronavirus disease 2019 given confirmed exposure has not been previously demonstrated, even though it has policy implications, such as the need for self-quarantine when exposure has occurred. Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, we used data collected between 20 December 2020 and 17 March 2021 from the second largest healthcare provider in Israel to analyze the probability of an additional household infection occurring within 10 days after an index infection. In model 1, vaccine effectiveness was described for Fully Vaccinated individuals (7 or more days from second dose) vs either Unvaccinated individuals or those Recently Vaccinated Once (0–7 days from the first dose, presumably still unprotected). Secondary analyses included correction for differing testing rates. In model 2, we conducted a separate analysis of households comprised of only adults with the same vaccination status. Results: A total of 173 569 households were included, of which 6351 had an index infection (mean [standard deviation] age, 58.9 [13.5] years); 50% were women. Adjusted vaccine effectiveness of Fully Vaccinated compared with Unvaccinated participants was 80.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73.5–85.4) and 82.0% (95% CI, 75.6–86.8) compared with those Recently Vaccinated Once. Conclusions: The BNT162b2 vaccine is effective in high-risk real-life exposureAbstract: Background: Although BNT162b2 vaccine-efficacy analyses have been published, the effectiveness of the vaccine in preventing coronavirus disease 2019 given confirmed exposure has not been previously demonstrated, even though it has policy implications, such as the need for self-quarantine when exposure has occurred. Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, we used data collected between 20 December 2020 and 17 March 2021 from the second largest healthcare provider in Israel to analyze the probability of an additional household infection occurring within 10 days after an index infection. In model 1, vaccine effectiveness was described for Fully Vaccinated individuals (7 or more days from second dose) vs either Unvaccinated individuals or those Recently Vaccinated Once (0–7 days from the first dose, presumably still unprotected). Secondary analyses included correction for differing testing rates. In model 2, we conducted a separate analysis of households comprised of only adults with the same vaccination status. Results: A total of 173 569 households were included, of which 6351 had an index infection (mean [standard deviation] age, 58.9 [13.5] years); 50% were women. Adjusted vaccine effectiveness of Fully Vaccinated compared with Unvaccinated participants was 80.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73.5–85.4) and 82.0% (95% CI, 75.6–86.8) compared with those Recently Vaccinated Once. Conclusions: The BNT162b2 vaccine is effective in high-risk real-life exposure scenarios, but the protection afforded in these settings is lower than that previously described. Individuals with a confirmed significant exposure to severe acute respiratory syndrome are still at risk of being infected even if fully vaccinated. Abstract : We evaluated BNT162b2 vaccine effectiveness against infection in high-risk exposure settings by analyzing vaccinated and unvaccinated household members of individuals with SARS-CoV-2. The vaccine is effective in high-risk real-life exposure scenarios but not as effective as in the general population. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical infectious diseases. Volume 75:Number 1(2022)
- Journal:
- Clinical infectious diseases
- Issue:
- Volume 75:Number 1(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 75, Issue 1 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 75
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0075-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- e734
- Page End:
- e740
- Publication Date:
- 2021-11-24
- Subjects:
- COVID -- 19 -- household contacts -- SARS -- CoV -- 2 -- vaccination
Communicable diseases -- Periodicals
616.905 - Journal URLs:
- http://cid.oxfordjournals.org ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/CID/journal ↗
http://www.jstor.org/journals/10584838.html ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/cid/ciab973 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1058-4838
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3286.293860
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23126.xml