Microbial electrolysis treatment of post-hydrothermal liquefaction wastewater with hydrogen generation. (15th February 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Shen, Ruixia; Jiang, Yong; Ge, Zheng; Lu, Jianwen; Zhang, Yuanhui; Liu, Zhidan; Ren, Zhiyong Jason
• Is Part Of: Applied energy. Volume 212(2018)
• Page Start: 509
• Page End: 515
• Publication Date: 2018-02-15
• Subjects: Organic wet waste -- Hydrothermal liquefaction -- Hydrogen production -- Microbial electrolysis cell -- Wastewater treatment; Power (Mechanics) -- Periodicals; Energy conservation -- Periodicals; Energy conversion -- Periodicals; 621.042
• DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.065
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0306-2619

Abstract

Highlights: Microbial electrolysis effectively removed both organics and nitrogen from post-HTL wastewater. It also generated high rate H2 that can be used for biocrude upgrading. Operating conditions can be optimized by varying loading rate, applied voltages and others. Abstract: Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) directly converts wet organic waste into biocrude oil, but it also generates post-HTL wastewater (PHWW) with concentrated nutrients that require further treatment before discharge or reuse. While traditional technologies showed limited success, this study demonstrates that microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) can be an effective approach to treat the swine manure PHWW and recover H2 for onsite HTL biocrude upgrading. The onsite H2 production and utilization makes MEC an ideal wastewater treatment process for HTL operations. Using actual swine manure PHWW, the MEC reactors showed excellent removals of organics (90–98%) and nitrogen (57–93%) under various organic loadings, applied voltages, and flow rates. Increasing organic loadings and applied voltages showed positive influences on system performance, while changes of flow rates showed limited impacts. The highest H2 production rate was 168.01 ± 7.01 mL/L/d with a H2 yield of 5.14 ± 0.22 mmol/kg COD (3000 mg COD/L, 1.0 V), and the highest cathodic H2 recovery and energy efficiency were 74.24 ± 0.11% and 120.56 ± 17.45%, respectively. System configuration and operation can be further optimized to improve system performance.