Lack of analgesic effects of transcranial pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation in neuropathic pain patients: A randomized double-blind crossover trial. (23rd April 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Lack of analgesic effects of transcranial pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation in neuropathic pain patients: A randomized double-blind crossover trial. (23rd April 2019)
- Main Title:
- Lack of analgesic effects of transcranial pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation in neuropathic pain patients: A randomized double-blind crossover trial
- Authors:
- Geraets, Chris N.W.
van Beilen, Marije
van Dijk, Mirjan
Kleijer, Hidde
Köhne, Charlotte
van der Hoeven, Johannes H.
Groen, Gerbrand J.
Ćurčić-Blake, Branislava
Schoevers, Robert A.
Maurits, Natasha M.
Kortekaas, Rudie - Abstract:
- Highlights: 30-min transcranial pulsed electromagnetic fields stimulation does not relieve neuropathic pain in patients. 30-min transcranial pulsed electromagnetic fields stimulation does not change heat pain thresholds in neuropathic pain patients. Warmth and heat pain detection showed strong time dependence, independent of transcranial pulsed electromagnetic field or sham stimulation. Abstract: Background: Neuromodulation is nowadays investigated as a promising method for pain relief. Research indicates that a single 30-minute stimulation with transcranial pulsed electromagnetic fields (tPEMF) can induce analgesic effects. However, it is unknown whether tPEMF can induce analgesia in neuropathic pain patients. Objective: To evaluate the effect of tPEMF on spontaneous pain and heat pain in neuropathic pain patients. Methods: This study had a randomized double-blind crossover design. Twenty neuropathic pain patients received 30-minutes of tPEMF and 30-minutes sham stimulation. Primary outcomes were pain intensity, pain aversion and heat pain. Secondary outcomes included affect, cognition, and motor function, to investigate safety, tolerability and putative working mechanisms of tPEMF. Outcomes were assessed before, during and after stimulation. Results: No differences in analgesic effects between tPEMF and sham stimulation were found for pain intensity, pain aversion or heat pain. No differences between tPEMF and sham stimulation were observed for affect, motor, and cognitiveHighlights: 30-min transcranial pulsed electromagnetic fields stimulation does not relieve neuropathic pain in patients. 30-min transcranial pulsed electromagnetic fields stimulation does not change heat pain thresholds in neuropathic pain patients. Warmth and heat pain detection showed strong time dependence, independent of transcranial pulsed electromagnetic field or sham stimulation. Abstract: Background: Neuromodulation is nowadays investigated as a promising method for pain relief. Research indicates that a single 30-minute stimulation with transcranial pulsed electromagnetic fields (tPEMF) can induce analgesic effects. However, it is unknown whether tPEMF can induce analgesia in neuropathic pain patients. Objective: To evaluate the effect of tPEMF on spontaneous pain and heat pain in neuropathic pain patients. Methods: This study had a randomized double-blind crossover design. Twenty neuropathic pain patients received 30-minutes of tPEMF and 30-minutes sham stimulation. Primary outcomes were pain intensity, pain aversion and heat pain. Secondary outcomes included affect, cognition, and motor function, to investigate safety, tolerability and putative working mechanisms of tPEMF. Outcomes were assessed before, during and after stimulation. Results: No differences in analgesic effects between tPEMF and sham stimulation were found for pain intensity, pain aversion or heat pain. No differences between tPEMF and sham stimulation were observed for affect, motor, and cognitive outcomes. Conclusion: A single 30-minute tPEMF stimulation did not induce analgesic effects in neuropathic pain patients, compared to sham. Further study is needed to determine whether prolonged stimulation is necessary for analgesic effects. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Neuroscience letters. Volume 699(2019)
- Journal:
- Neuroscience letters
- Issue:
- Volume 699(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 699, Issue 2019 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 699
- Issue:
- 2019
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0699-2019-0000
- Page Start:
- 212
- Page End:
- 216
- Publication Date:
- 2019-04-23
- Subjects:
- Neuropathic pain -- Pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) -- Complex neural pulse ™(CNP) -- Transcranial magnetic stimulation -- Neuromodulation -- Extremely low frequency (ELF)
Neurology -- Periodicals
Neurology -- Periodicals
Research -- Periodicals
Neurologie -- Périodiques
Neuroanatomie -- Périodiques
Neuropharmacologie -- Périodiques
Neurophysiologie -- Périodiques
Neurology
Periodicals
Electronic journals
617.48 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03043940 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.neulet.2019.01.051 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0304-3940
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6081.562000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23120.xml