Low-dose radiotherapy to the lungs using an interventional radiology C-arm fluoroscope: Monte Carlo treatment planning and dose measurements in a postmortem subject. (1st November 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Low-dose radiotherapy to the lungs using an interventional radiology C-arm fluoroscope: Monte Carlo treatment planning and dose measurements in a postmortem subject. (1st November 2022)
- Main Title:
- Low-dose radiotherapy to the lungs using an interventional radiology C-arm fluoroscope: Monte Carlo treatment planning and dose measurements in a postmortem subject
- Authors:
- Leon, S
Paucar, O
Correa, N
Glassell, M
Gonzales, A
Olguin, E
Shankar, A
Moskvin, V
Schwarz, B
Alva-Sanchez, M
Moyses, H
Hamrick, B
Sarria, G R
Li, B
Tajima, T
Necas, A
Guzman, C
Challco, R
Montoya, M
Meza, Z
Zapata, M
Gonzales, A
Marquina, J
Quispe, K
Chavez, T
Castilla, L
Moscoso, J
Ramirez, J
Marquez, F
Neira, R
Vilca, W
Mendez, J
Hernandez, J
Roa, D
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objective. The goal of this study was to use Monte Carlo (MC) simulations and measurements to investigate the dosimetric suitability of an interventional radiology (IR) c-arm fluoroscope to deliver low-dose radiotherapy to the lungs. Approach. A previously-validated MC model of an IR fluoroscope was used to calculate the dose distributions in a COVID-19-infected patient, 20 non-infected patients of varying sizes, and a postmortem subject. Dose distributions for PA, AP/PA, 3-field and 4-field treatments irradiating 95% of the lungs to a 0.5 Gy dose were calculated. An algorithm was created to calculate skin entrance dose as a function of patient thickness for treatment planning purposes. Treatments were experimentally validated in a postmortem subject by using implanted dosimeters to capture organ doses. Main results. Mean doses to the left/right lungs for the COVID-19 CT data were 1.2/1.3 Gy, 0.8/0.9 Gy, 0.8/0.8 Gy and 0.6/0.6 Gy for the PA, AP/PA, 3-field, and 4-field configurations, respectively. Skin dose toxicity was the highest probability for the PA and lowest for the 4-field configuration. Dose to the heart slightly exceeded the ICRP tolerance; all other organ doses were below published tolerances. The AP/PA configuration provided the best fit for entrance skin dose as a function of patient thickness (R 2 = 0.8). The average dose difference between simulation and measurement in the postmortem subject was 5%. Significance. An IR fluoroscope should be capableAbstract: Objective. The goal of this study was to use Monte Carlo (MC) simulations and measurements to investigate the dosimetric suitability of an interventional radiology (IR) c-arm fluoroscope to deliver low-dose radiotherapy to the lungs. Approach. A previously-validated MC model of an IR fluoroscope was used to calculate the dose distributions in a COVID-19-infected patient, 20 non-infected patients of varying sizes, and a postmortem subject. Dose distributions for PA, AP/PA, 3-field and 4-field treatments irradiating 95% of the lungs to a 0.5 Gy dose were calculated. An algorithm was created to calculate skin entrance dose as a function of patient thickness for treatment planning purposes. Treatments were experimentally validated in a postmortem subject by using implanted dosimeters to capture organ doses. Main results. Mean doses to the left/right lungs for the COVID-19 CT data were 1.2/1.3 Gy, 0.8/0.9 Gy, 0.8/0.8 Gy and 0.6/0.6 Gy for the PA, AP/PA, 3-field, and 4-field configurations, respectively. Skin dose toxicity was the highest probability for the PA and lowest for the 4-field configuration. Dose to the heart slightly exceeded the ICRP tolerance; all other organ doses were below published tolerances. The AP/PA configuration provided the best fit for entrance skin dose as a function of patient thickness (R 2 = 0.8). The average dose difference between simulation and measurement in the postmortem subject was 5%. Significance. An IR fluoroscope should be capable of delivering low-dose radiotherapy to the lungs with tolerable collateral dose to nearby organs. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Biomedical physics & engineering express. Volume 8:Number 6(2022)
- Journal:
- Biomedical physics & engineering express
- Issue:
- Volume 8:Number 6(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 8, Issue 6 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 8
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0008-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2022-11-01
- Subjects:
- Monte Carlo -- fluoroscopy -- low dose radiotherapy
Medical physics -- Periodicals
Biophysics -- Periodicals
Biomedical engineering -- Periodicals
Medical sciences -- Periodicals
610.153 - Journal URLs:
- http://iopscience.iop.org/2057-1976/ ↗
http://www.iop.org/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1088/2057-1976/ac8939 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2057-1976
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23104.xml