Social Norms Sustaining Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Review of Methodologies for Proxy Measures. (December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Seff, Ilana
• Is Part Of: Trauma, violence & abuse. Volume 23:Number 5(2022)
• Page Start: 1708
• Page End: 1727
• Publication Date: 2022-12
• Subjects: social norms -- intimate partner violence -- quantitative methods -- proxy measures -- attitudes; Child abuse -- Periodicals; Post-traumatic stress disorder in children -- Periodicals; Violence -- Periodicals; Family violence -- Periodicals; Violence envers les enfants -- Périodiques; Violence familiale -- Périodiques; Névroses post-traumatiques -- Périodiques; 616.8521
• DOI: 10.1177/15248380211013141
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1524-8380

Abstract

In light of the many robust quantitative data sets that include information on attitudes and behaviors related to intimate partner violence (IPV), and in an effort to expand the evidence base around social norms and IPV, many researchers construct proxy measures of norms within and across groups embedded in the data. While this strategy has become increasingly popular, there is no standardized approach for assessing and constructing these norm proxies, and no review of these approaches has been undertaken to date. This study presents the results of a systematic review of methods used to construct quantitative proxy measures for social norms related to IPV. PubMed, Embase, Popline, and Scopus, and PsycINFO were searched using Boolean search techniques. Inclusion criteria comprised studies published since 2000 in English that either (i) examined a norm proxy related to gender or IPV or (ii) analyzed the relationship between a norm proxy and perpetration of, experiences of, or attitudes toward IPV. Studies that employed qualitative methods or that elicited direct measures of descriptive or injunctive norms were not included. Twenty-six studies were eligible for review. Evidence from this review highlights inconsistencies in how proxies are constructed, how they are assessed to ensure valid representation of norms, and how researchers acknowledge their respective method's limitations. Key processes and reflections employed by some of the studies are identified and recommended for future research inquiries.