A survey of health care practitioners' attitudes toward shared decision‐making for choice of next birth after cesarean. Issue 2 (4th February 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Munro, Sarah; Wilcox, Elizabeth S.; Lambert, Leah K.; Norena, Monica; Kaufman, Sarah; Encinger, Jana; Kendall, Tamil; Thompson, Rachel
• Is Part Of: Birth. Volume 48:Issue 2(2021)
• Page Start: 194
• Page End: 208
• Publication Date: 2021-02-04
• Subjects: cesarean -- obstetrics -- patient engagement -- shared decision‐making -- vaginal birth after cesarean; Childbirth -- Periodicals; Obstetrics -- Periodicals; Newborn infants -- Care -- Periodicals; Natural childbirth -- Periodicals; 618.1
• DOI: 10.1111/birt.12529
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0730-7659

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Patients with a history of cesarean may benefit from shared decision‐making (SDM) interventions, such as patient decision aids, that provide individualized clinical information and help to clarify personal preferences. We sought to understand the factors that influence how care practitioners support choices for mode of birth and what individual and health system factors influence uptake of SDM in routine care. Methods: We conducted a cross‐sectional survey of health care practitioners in British Columbia, Canada (2016‐2017). Participants included family physicians, midwives, obstetricians, and registered nurses. We conducted descriptive and inferential analyses of quantitative data and subjected the open‐ended survey responses to thematic analysis. Results: Analysis of survey responses (n = 307) suggested there was no significant association between the size of the participant hospital and their medico‐legal concerns about mode of birth. Environmental factors that may influence the use of SDM included the length of time it takes to initiate an emergency cesarean and the timing of when the SDM intervention is introduced to the patient. No participants reported protocols prohibiting VBAC at their hospital. Participants preferred an SDM approach where the pregnant person is involved in making the final decision for mode of birth. Conclusions: Although maternity care practitioners express attitudes and behaviors that may support SDM for mode of birth after cesarean, implementing SDM using a patient decision aid alone may be challenging because of environmental factors. Our study demonstrates how survey data can aid in identifying how, when, where, for whom, and why an SDM intervention could be implemented.