Assessment of deep vein thrombosis using routine pre- and postoperative duplex Doppler ultrasound in patients with pelvic trauma: a prospective study. (1st February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cerbasi, Simone; Bernasconi, Alessio; Balato, Giovanni; Dimitri, Federica; Zingaretti, Oriana; Orabona, Gianclaudio; Pascarella, Raffaele; Mariconda, Massimo
• Is Part Of: Bone & joint journal. Volume 104B:Number 2(2022)
• Page Start: 283
• Page End: 289
• Publication Date: 2022-02-01
• Subjects: Pelvic -- Acetabular -- Thrombosis -- Embolism -- Ultrasound -- Doppler -- Doppler ultrasound -- Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) -- Orthopedic and Trauma -- Pelvic and acetabular fractures -- Trauma surgery -- Logistic regression analysis -- Lower limbs -- CT angiography -- Multivariate logistic regression analysis -- Pulmonary embolism (PE); Bones -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Joints -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Orthopedic surgery -- Periodicals; 617.47005
• DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B2.BJJ-2021-0764.R2
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2049-4394

Abstract

Abstract : Aims: The aims of this study were to assess the pre- and postoperative incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) using routine duplex Doppler ultrasound (DUS), to assess the incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) using CT angiography, and to identify the factors that predict postoperative DVT in patients with a pelvic and/or acetabular fracture. Methods: All patients treated surgically for a pelvic and/or acetabular fracture between October 2016 and January 2020 were enrolled into this prospective single-centre study. The demographic, medical, and surgical details of the patients were recorded. DVT screening of the lower limbs was routinely performed using DUS before and at six to ten days after surgery. CT angiography was used in patients who were suspected of having PE. Age-adjusted univariate and stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis were used to determine the association between explanatory variables and postoperative DVT. Results: A total of 191 patients were included. A DVT was found preoperatively in 12 patients (6.3%), of which six were proximal. A postoperative DVT was found in 42 patients (22%), of which 27 were proximal. Eight patients (4.2%) had a PE, which was secondary to a DVT in three. None of the 12 patients in whom a vena cava filter was implanted prophylactically had a PE. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that the association with the need for spinal surgery (odds ratio (OR) 19.78 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12 to 348.08); p = 0.041), intramedullary nailing of a long bone fracture (OR 4.44 (95% CI 1.05 to 18.86); p = 0.043), an operating time > two hours (OR 3.28 (95% CI 1.09 to 9.88); p = 0.035), and additional trauma surgery (OR 3.1 (95% CI 1.03 to 9.45); p = 0.045) were statistically the most relevant independent predictors of a postoperative DVT. Conclusion: The acknowledgement of the risk factors for the development of a DVT and their weight is crucial to set a threshold for the index of suspicion for this diagnosis by medical staff. We suggest the routine use of the DUS screening for DVT in patients with a pelvic and/or acetabular fracture before and six to ten days after surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(2):283–289.