Writing on Death: Plague Narratives. A Review Essay. (20th January 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Meng, Michael
• Is Part Of: Comparative studies in society and history. Volume 64:Number 1(2022)
• Page Start: 238
• Page End: 258
• Publication Date: 2022-01-20
• Subjects: plagues -- death -- language -- history -- salvation -- COVID-19 -- Boccaccio -- Defoe -- Shelley -- Snowden -- Thucydides; Social sciences -- Periodicals; History -- Periodicals; 300
• DOI: 10.1017/S0010417521000451
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0010-4175

Abstract

Abstract: This essay discusses several books, ancient and recent, on plagues to ask the question: Can we face death without turning away from it through historical narration? Can we write about death, which only afflicts individuals, without stripping death of its individuality? After briefly addressing these questions, I discuss five books, one from the ancient period (Thucydides's Peloponnesian War ), one from the late medieval period (Giovanni Boccaccio's The Decameron ), one from the early modern period (Daniel Defoe's A Journal of the Plague Year ), and two from the modern period (Mary Shelley's The Last Man, and Frank Snowden's Epidemics and Society ). These books not only come from different eras but also reflect different written responses to death—ancient history, story/fable, reportage, futuristic novel, and contemporary history. The essay concludes by considering a counterargument to its focus on death, an argument developed by Baruch Spinoza which claims that humans should think nothing less than of death.