Are MRI-detected erosions specific for RA? A large explorative cross-sectional study. Issue 6 (28th February 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Boeters, Debbie M; Nieuwenhuis, Wouter P; van Steenbergen, Hanna W; Reijnierse, Monique; Landewé, Robert B M; van der Helm-van Mil, Annette H M
• Is Part Of: Annals of the rheumatic diseases. Volume 77:Issue 6(2018)
• Page Start: 861
• Page End: 868
• Publication Date: 2018-02-28
• Subjects: rheumatoid arthritis -- magnetic resonance imaging -- arthritis; Rheumatism -- Periodicals; 616.723005
• DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212252
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0003-4967

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: MRI is recommended in the diagnostic process of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to detect joint damage early. MRI-detected erosions are also present in symptom-free controls, especially at older age. It is unclear if RA-specific MRI-detected erosions can be distinguished from 'physiological' erosions in symptom-free individuals. This study compared MRI-detected erosions of patients with RA with healthy controls and with other arthritides. Methods: 589 newly presenting patients with early arthritis (238 RA, 351 other arthritides) and 193 symptom-free controls underwent contrast-enhanced 1.5T MRI of unilateral metacarpophalangeal and metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints. Total erosion score (according to the Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI Scoring System), number, severity, location of erosions and simultaneous presence of MRI-detected inflammation (synovitis and/or bone marrow oedema) were compared; participants were categorised in three age groups (<40, 40–59, ≥60). Results: Patients with RA had statistically significant higher total erosion scores than controls but scores of individual persons largely overlapped. Grade ≥2 erosions and MTP5 erosions were specific for RA (specificity 98%–100% and 90%–98% for different age groups). MTP1 erosions were only specific if aged <40 (specificity 98%) and erosions with inflammation if aged <60 (specificity 91%–100%). ≥1 of the mentioned erosion characteristics were present in 29% of patients with RA. Comparing patients with RA with other arthritides revealed that grade ≥2 erosions and MTP5 erosions remained specific for RA (specificity ≥89%) as well as MTP1 erosions if aged <40 (specificity 93%), in contrast to erosions combined with inflammation (specificity 49%–85%). Conclusions: Total erosion scores of individual persons were largely overlapping. Erosion characteristics specific for RA were identified, but were infrequently present. Caution is needed not to overestimate the value of MRI erosions in the diagnostic process.