P86 Complete Sudden Recanalization: there is hope beyond the first pass effect. (29th August 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- P86 Complete Sudden Recanalization: there is hope beyond the first pass effect. (29th August 2022)
- Main Title:
- P86 Complete Sudden Recanalization: there is hope beyond the first pass effect
- Authors:
- Requena, M
García-Tornel, Á
Rodríguez, I
Olivé-Gadea, M
De Dios, M
Rodrigo, M
Rivera, E
Muchada, M
Piñana, C
Boned, S
Gramegna, LL
Rubiera, M
Hernández, D
Molina, C
Ribo, M
Tomasello, A - Abstract:
- Abstract : Introduction: Achieving complete recanalization in a minimum number of attempts is the main procedural objective of mechanical thrombectomy. We aimed to explore the effect of the recanalization pattern in patients with final complete recanalization. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with terminal carotid internal artery or M1-middle cerebral artery occlusion and complete recanalization (eTICI 2c-3) from 2014 in our center. Complete Sudden Recanalization (cSR) was considered when eTICI varied from 0–1 to 2c-3 without an interim partial recanalization step (2a or 2b) (progressive recanalization, PR). We explored the effect of cSR on clinical outcome compared with progressive complete recanalization. Results: Among four hundred patients with complete recanalization, in 301 was achieved with a cSR pattern. There were no differences between groups in terms demographic or clinical data and use of intravenous rtPA (42.2% vs 44.4%, p=0.69). The rate of terminal carotid artery occlusion (28.6% vs 44.4%, p=0.003), median number of passes (1 (IQR 1–2) vs 2 (2–3), p<0.001) and time from puncture to recanalization (27 (IQR 18–43) vs 46 (34–66) minutes; p<0.001) were lower in cSR group. At 90 days cSR was an independent predictor of good functional outcome (57.8% vs 44.4%, p=0.038). Compared with first pass effect, cSR after the first pass didn´t worsen the rate of good functional outcome (57.6% vs 58.6%, p=0.889). Conclusion: Among patients with aAbstract : Introduction: Achieving complete recanalization in a minimum number of attempts is the main procedural objective of mechanical thrombectomy. We aimed to explore the effect of the recanalization pattern in patients with final complete recanalization. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with terminal carotid internal artery or M1-middle cerebral artery occlusion and complete recanalization (eTICI 2c-3) from 2014 in our center. Complete Sudden Recanalization (cSR) was considered when eTICI varied from 0–1 to 2c-3 without an interim partial recanalization step (2a or 2b) (progressive recanalization, PR). We explored the effect of cSR on clinical outcome compared with progressive complete recanalization. Results: Among four hundred patients with complete recanalization, in 301 was achieved with a cSR pattern. There were no differences between groups in terms demographic or clinical data and use of intravenous rtPA (42.2% vs 44.4%, p=0.69). The rate of terminal carotid artery occlusion (28.6% vs 44.4%, p=0.003), median number of passes (1 (IQR 1–2) vs 2 (2–3), p<0.001) and time from puncture to recanalization (27 (IQR 18–43) vs 46 (34–66) minutes; p<0.001) were lower in cSR group. At 90 days cSR was an independent predictor of good functional outcome (57.8% vs 44.4%, p=0.038). Compared with first pass effect, cSR after the first pass didn´t worsen the rate of good functional outcome (57.6% vs 58.6%, p=0.889). Conclusion: Among patients with a large vessel occlusion, the complete sudden recanalization pattern was a predictor of functional independence even when it did not occur in the first attempt. References: Zaidat OO, Castonguay AC, Linfante I, et al . First pass effect: a new measure for stroke thrombectomy devices. Stroke 2018 Mar;49 (3):660–666. DOI: 10.1161/Stroke AHA.117.020315. EPUB 2018 Feb 19. PMID: 29459390. García-Tornel Á, Rubiera M, Requena M, et al . Sudden recanalization: a game-changing factor in endovascular treatment of large vessel occlusion strokes. Stroke 2020 Apr;51 (4):1313–1316. DOI: 10.1161/Stroke AHA.119.028787. EPUB 2020 Feb 14. PMID: 32078495. Do you have any conflict of interest to declare? : No … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of neurointerventional surgery. Volume 14(2022)Supplement 2
- Journal:
- Journal of neurointerventional surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 14(2022)Supplement 2
- Issue Display:
- Volume 14, Issue 2 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 14
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0014-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- A43
- Page End:
- A43
- Publication Date:
- 2022-08-29
- Subjects:
- Nervous system -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Cerebrovascular disease -- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.48 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://jnis.bmj.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/neurintsurg-2022-ESMINT.106 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1759-8478
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23065.xml