B5 High-volume PCEA versus PIEB for labour analgesia: a randomised, double-blind, two-center, non-inferiority study in nulliparous women investigating quality of pain relief. (11th August 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- B5 High-volume PCEA versus PIEB for labour analgesia: a randomised, double-blind, two-center, non-inferiority study in nulliparous women investigating quality of pain relief. (11th August 2022)
- Main Title:
- B5 High-volume PCEA versus PIEB for labour analgesia: a randomised, double-blind, two-center, non-inferiority study in nulliparous women investigating quality of pain relief
- Authors:
- Filetici, N
Roofthooft, E
Rex, S
Wong, CA
Van de Velde, M - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background and Aims: Maintenance of neuraxial labour analgesia using programmed intermittent epidural boluses (PIEB) is superior compared to continuous epidural infusions with/without patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA), causing less breakthrough pain, motor block and local anesthetic (LA) consumption 1 . Compared to low-volume PCEA without background infusion, PIEB produces less breakthrough pain and motor block, despite higher LA consumption. The goal of this randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority study was to investigate if high-volume PCEA without background infusion compared to PIEB+PCEA, set with equal boluses, results in a similar incidence of breakthrough pain and LA consumption. Methods: Following ethics approval and written consent, combined spinal-epidural for labour was performed in 360 nulliparous women. Analgesia was maintained with ropivacaine 0.12% and sufentanil 0.75mcg/mL. Patients randomly received high-volume PCEA without background infusion set at 10 mL bolus with a 30 min lock-out or PIEB as 10 mL bolus every hour plus PCEA boluses of 5 mL with a 30 min lock-out. Breakthrough pain, motor block and LA consumption were recorded. Results: Final analysis was performed in 336 women (PCEA n=170; PIEB-PCEA n=166). Breakthrough pain occurred in 11.2% in the PCEA-group and 10.8% in the PIEB-group. Total LA consumption was lower in the PCEA-group than in the PIEB-group (mean 53.1 versus 65.2 mL respectively, p< 0.0001). Motor block was notAbstract : Background and Aims: Maintenance of neuraxial labour analgesia using programmed intermittent epidural boluses (PIEB) is superior compared to continuous epidural infusions with/without patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA), causing less breakthrough pain, motor block and local anesthetic (LA) consumption 1 . Compared to low-volume PCEA without background infusion, PIEB produces less breakthrough pain and motor block, despite higher LA consumption. The goal of this randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority study was to investigate if high-volume PCEA without background infusion compared to PIEB+PCEA, set with equal boluses, results in a similar incidence of breakthrough pain and LA consumption. Methods: Following ethics approval and written consent, combined spinal-epidural for labour was performed in 360 nulliparous women. Analgesia was maintained with ropivacaine 0.12% and sufentanil 0.75mcg/mL. Patients randomly received high-volume PCEA without background infusion set at 10 mL bolus with a 30 min lock-out or PIEB as 10 mL bolus every hour plus PCEA boluses of 5 mL with a 30 min lock-out. Breakthrough pain, motor block and LA consumption were recorded. Results: Final analysis was performed in 336 women (PCEA n=170; PIEB-PCEA n=166). Breakthrough pain occurred in 11.2% in the PCEA-group and 10.8% in the PIEB-group. Total LA consumption was lower in the PCEA-group than in the PIEB-group (mean 53.1 versus 65.2 mL respectively, p< 0.0001). Motor block was not different between groups (p=0.783). Conclusions: High-volume PCEA without background infusion and PIEB showed a similar incidence of breakthrough pain and motor block. The PCEA-group had a lower total LA consumption. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Regional anesthesia and pain medicine. Volume 47(2022)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Regional anesthesia and pain medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 47(2022)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 47, Issue 1 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 47
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0047-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- A85
- Page End:
- A85
- Publication Date:
- 2022-08-11
- Subjects:
- Conduction anesthesia -- Periodicals
Pain medicine -- Periodicals
617.964 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.rapm.org/ ↗
https://journals.lww.com/rapm/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/10987339 ↗
https://rapm.bmj.com/ ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/rapm-2022-ESRA.81 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1098-7339
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 7336.572210
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23075.xml