B64 Comparison of suprainguinal fascia iliaca and peng blocks on postoperative pain and functional recovery after total hip arthroplasty: preliminary results of a non-inferiority trial. (11th August 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- B64 Comparison of suprainguinal fascia iliaca and peng blocks on postoperative pain and functional recovery after total hip arthroplasty: preliminary results of a non-inferiority trial. (11th August 2022)
- Main Title:
- B64 Comparison of suprainguinal fascia iliaca and peng blocks on postoperative pain and functional recovery after total hip arthroplasty: preliminary results of a non-inferiority trial
- Authors:
- Carella, M
Beck, F
Piette, N
Lecoq, J-P
Bonhomme, VL - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background and Aims: Pain after posterolateral-approachedtotal hip arthroplasty (PLTHA) may affect early functional recovery.Supra-inguinal fascia iliaca (SFICB) and pericapsular nerve group blocks (PENG) have been proposed as promising analgesia techniques. 1–3 This trial was conducted to assess non-inferiority of PENG as compared to SFICB for controlling postoperative pain.Secondary outcomes included several assessments functional recovery. Methods: After approval by our local Ethics Committee (2020/381), forty-three patients scheduled for PLTHA with spinal anesthesia were prospectively and randomly allocated to groups.Group S and Group P received SFICB (40 mL ropivacaine 0.375%) or PENG (20 mL ropivacaine 0.75%), respectively.A blinded observer evaluated rest and mobilization pain on a 0–10 numeric rating scale (NRS) at fixed time points: 1h and 6h after surgery, at day-1 and day-2 at 8am, 1pm and 6pm. At day-1 and day-2, evolution on quality-of-recovery-15 score (QoR-15), timed-up-and-go (TUG), 2-minutes (2MWT) and 6-minutes-walking (6MWT) tests were performed.Non-inferiority margin was set as 1 NRS point 6 hours after surgery.Data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney or generalized linear mixed model tests as appropriate. Results: 6-hours after PLTHA, group PNRS was non-inferior to group S NRS ( Figure 1A ).Groups had no significant differences regarding rest and dynamic pain trajectory during the first 48 postoperative hours ( Figure 1B ), as well as regardingAbstract : Background and Aims: Pain after posterolateral-approachedtotal hip arthroplasty (PLTHA) may affect early functional recovery.Supra-inguinal fascia iliaca (SFICB) and pericapsular nerve group blocks (PENG) have been proposed as promising analgesia techniques. 1–3 This trial was conducted to assess non-inferiority of PENG as compared to SFICB for controlling postoperative pain.Secondary outcomes included several assessments functional recovery. Methods: After approval by our local Ethics Committee (2020/381), forty-three patients scheduled for PLTHA with spinal anesthesia were prospectively and randomly allocated to groups.Group S and Group P received SFICB (40 mL ropivacaine 0.375%) or PENG (20 mL ropivacaine 0.75%), respectively.A blinded observer evaluated rest and mobilization pain on a 0–10 numeric rating scale (NRS) at fixed time points: 1h and 6h after surgery, at day-1 and day-2 at 8am, 1pm and 6pm. At day-1 and day-2, evolution on quality-of-recovery-15 score (QoR-15), timed-up-and-go (TUG), 2-minutes (2MWT) and 6-minutes-walking (6MWT) tests were performed.Non-inferiority margin was set as 1 NRS point 6 hours after surgery.Data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney or generalized linear mixed model tests as appropriate. Results: 6-hours after PLTHA, group PNRS was non-inferior to group S NRS ( Figure 1A ).Groups had no significant differences regarding rest and dynamic pain trajectory during the first 48 postoperative hours ( Figure 1B ), as well as regarding motor and functional recovery at day-1 and day-2 as assessed by TUG, 2MWT, 6MWT and QoR-15 ( Figure 2 ). Conclusions: In PLTHA, PENG is non-inferior to SFICB regarding postoperative pain control and no differences are observed regarding postoperative functional recovery.These results should be confirmed once the planned sample size (105) will have been recruited. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Regional anesthesia and pain medicine. Volume 47(2022)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Regional anesthesia and pain medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 47(2022)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 47, Issue 1 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 47
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0047-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- A116
- Page End:
- A117
- Publication Date:
- 2022-08-11
- Subjects:
- Conduction anesthesia -- Periodicals
Pain medicine -- Periodicals
617.964 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.rapm.org/ ↗
https://journals.lww.com/rapm/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/10987339 ↗
https://rapm.bmj.com/ ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/rapm-2022-ESRA.139 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1098-7339
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 7336.572210
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23075.xml