929 The Incidence and Outcomes of Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Bile Duct Exploration on a Unit Adopting Index Admission Surgery for All Comers. a Review of 5750 Patients. (19th August 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Welsh, S; Sallam, M; Nassar, A
• Is Part Of: British journal of surgery. Volume 109(2022)Supplement 6
• Publication Date: 2022-08-19
• Subjects: Surgery -- Periodicals; 617.005
• DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac269.259
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0007-1323

Abstract

Abstract: Aim: The timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for emergency biliary admissions remains inconsistent with national and international guidelines. The perception that LC is difficult in acute cholecystitis and the popularity of the two-session approach to pancreatitis and suspected choledocholithiasis result in delayed management. Method: Analysis of prospectively maintained data in a unit adopting "intention to treat" during the index admission. The aim was to study the incidence of previous biliary admissions and compare the operative difficulty, complications, and postoperative outcomes with index admission LC. Results: Of 5750 LC performed 20.8% had previous biliary admissions; one in 93% and two or more in 7%. Most presented with biliary colic (39.6%) and acute cholecystitis (27.6%). A previous biliary history was associated with increased operative difficulty (p<0.001), longer operating times (86.9 v 68.1 minutes, p<0.001), more post-operative complications (7.5% v 5.2%, p=0.002) and longer hospital stay (8.1 v 5.5 days, p<0.001). However, conversion and mortality rates showed no significant differences. Conclusion: Index admission LC is superior to interval cholecystectomy and should be offered to all patients fit for general anaesthesia regardless of presenting complaints. Subspecialisation should be encouraged as a major factor in optimising resource utilisation and post-operative outcomes of biliary emergencies.