294 Stem Cell Enriched Fat Grafts Versus Autologous Fat Grafts for Facial Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (19th August 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- 294 Stem Cell Enriched Fat Grafts Versus Autologous Fat Grafts for Facial Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (19th August 2022)
- Main Title:
- 294 Stem Cell Enriched Fat Grafts Versus Autologous Fat Grafts for Facial Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Authors:
- Karam, M
Abul, A
Kahlar, N
Naik, A
Tay, J
Rahman, S
Matteucci, P - Abstract:
- Abstract: Aim: To compare the results of stem cell-enhanced fat grafting to autologous fat grafting for face reconstruction. Method: A systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines, and an electronic search was carried out to identify all Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs), case control studies, and cohort studies comparing the outcomes of stem cell-enrichment fat grafting versus routine fat grafting for facial reconstruction. The primary outcome measures were volume retention and infection rate. Secondary outcome measures included post-surgery patient satisfaction, redness and swelling, fat necrosis, cysts, and operation time. For the analysis, fixed and random effects modelling were utilised. Results: Eight studies with a total of 275 participants were assessed. In terms of mean volume retention, there was a significant difference between the stem cell-enrichment fat grafting and routine grafting groups (standardised Mean Difference [MD] = 2.49, P 0.00001). However, there was no significant difference in infection rates between the two groups (OR = 0.36, P = 0.30). Except for the operation duration, which was shorter in the latter, the intervention group had similar results to the control group for all secondary outcomes. Conclusions: When compared to conventional fat grafting, stem cell-enriched fat grafting is a better alternative for facialAbstract: Aim: To compare the results of stem cell-enhanced fat grafting to autologous fat grafting for face reconstruction. Method: A systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines, and an electronic search was carried out to identify all Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs), case control studies, and cohort studies comparing the outcomes of stem cell-enrichment fat grafting versus routine fat grafting for facial reconstruction. The primary outcome measures were volume retention and infection rate. Secondary outcome measures included post-surgery patient satisfaction, redness and swelling, fat necrosis, cysts, and operation time. For the analysis, fixed and random effects modelling were utilised. Results: Eight studies with a total of 275 participants were assessed. In terms of mean volume retention, there was a significant difference between the stem cell-enrichment fat grafting and routine grafting groups (standardised Mean Difference [MD] = 2.49, P 0.00001). However, there was no significant difference in infection rates between the two groups (OR = 0.36, P = 0.30). Except for the operation duration, which was shorter in the latter, the intervention group had similar results to the control group for all secondary outcomes. Conclusions: When compared to conventional fat grafting, stem cell-enriched fat grafting is a better alternative for facial reconstruction surgery since it enhances mean volume retention and does not worsen patient satisfaction or surgical complications. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of surgery. Volume 109(2022)Supplement 6
- Journal:
- British journal of surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 109(2022)Supplement 6
- Issue Display:
- Volume 109, Issue 6 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 109
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0109-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2022-08-19
- Subjects:
- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bjs.co.uk/bjsCda/cda/microHome.do ↗
https://academic.oup.com/bjs# ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/bjs/znac269.301 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0007-1323
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2325.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23064.xml