Towards better understanding and narrowing of the science–practice gap: A practitioner-centered approach to management knowledge creation. Issue 4 (August 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Božič, Katerina; Bachkirov, Alexandre Anatolievich; Černe, Matej
• Is Part Of: European management journal. Volume 40:Issue 4(2022)
• Page Start: 632
• Page End: 644
• Publication Date: 2022-08
• Subjects: Science-practice gap -- Rigor-relevance debate -- Knowledge creation -- Practitioners' voice -- Collaboration challenges -- Grounded theory; Management -- Periodicals; Management -- Europe -- Periodicals; Gestion -- Périodiques; Gestion -- Europe -- Périodiques; Management; Europe; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 658.0094
• DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2021.09.006
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0263-2373

Abstract

Abstract: The lack of mutual communication and collaboration between academic research and management practice, and the limited implementation of the research findings in strategic and tactical decision-making in practice settings, known as the science-practice 'gap', remains an essential issue in management research. We challenge the primary focus on academics for the possibilities of bridging the gap by arguing that the picture remains incomplete without a closer look at the positions, perceptions, and attitudes of practicing managers toward the joint production of relevant management knowledge. Based on the inductive, grounded theory approach, we conducted a qualitative study of 47 practicing managers with different organizational and functional responsibilities across various industry sectors. Although practitioners perceived practice-engaged research design and execution, relevant management research, and benefits from complementary knowledge as enablers of fruitful science-practice collaboration, our emerging findings revealed limited trust, limited cognition, coping strategies, and heuristic information processing to be important barriers for practitioners that hamper the collaboration process. Relying on the cognitive and information processing framework and theory of the conservation of resources, we aimed to explain the antecedent of (un)successful collaboration on the practitioners' side, thus extending our understanding of the scholarship of integration.