Examining the epigenetic mechanisms of childhood adversity and sensitive periods: A gene set-based approach. (October 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zhu, Yiwen; Lussier, Alexandre A.; Smith, Andrew D.A.C.; Simpkin, Andrew J.; Suderman, Matthew J.; Walton, Esther; Relton, Caroline L.; Dunn, Erin C.
• Is Part Of: Psychoneuroendocrinology. Volume 144(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-10
• Subjects: Childhood adversity -- Sensitive periods -- ALSPAC -- Plasticity -- Epigenetics; Psychoneuroendocrinology -- Periodicals; Endocrinology -- Periodicals; Neurology -- Periodicals; Psychiatry -- Periodicals; Neuropsychoendocrinologie -- Périodiques; 616.8
• DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2022.105854
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0306-4530

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Sensitive periods are developmental stages of heightened plasticity when life experiences, including exposure to childhood adversity, have the potential to exert more lasting impacts. Epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation (DNAm), may provide a pathway through which adversity induces long-term biological changes. DNAm shifts may be more likely to occur during sensitive periods, especially within genes that regulate the timing of sensitive periods. Here, we investigated the possibility that childhood adversity during specific life stages is associated with DNAm changes in genes known to regulate the timing and duration of sensitive periods. Methods: Genome-wide DNAm profiles came from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (n = 785). We first used principal component analysis (PCA) to summarize DNAm variation across 530 CpG sites mapped to the promoters of 58 genes previously-identified as regulating sensitive periods. Gene-level DNAm summaries were calculated for genes regulating sensitive period opening (ngenes = 15), closing (ngenes = 36), and expression (ngenes = 8). We then performed linear discriminant analysis (LDA) to test associations between seven types of parent-reported, time-varying measures of exposure to childhood adversity and DNAm principal components. To our knowledge, this is the first time LDA has been applied to analyze functionally grouped DNAm data to characterize associations between an environmental exposure and epigenetic differences. Results: Suggestive evidence emerged for associations between sexual or physical abuse as well as financial hardship during middle childhood, and DNAm of genetic pathways regulating sensitive period opening and expression. However, no statistically significant associations were identified after multiple testing correction. Conclusions: Our gene set-based method combining PCA and LDA complements epigenome-wide approaches. Although our results were largely null, these findings provide a proof-of-concept for studying time-varying exposures and gene- or pathway-level epigenetic modifications. Highlights: Early life adversity may affect epigenetic regulation of developmental plasticity. The effects of adversity may be strongest during sensitive periods of development. Analyzing the timing and type of childhood adversity could reveal new findings. Gene set analyses complement genome-wide studies, yielding functional insights.