A biomechanical study: Comparison of three different implant options in high Tibial osteotomy. (August 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A biomechanical study: Comparison of three different implant options in high Tibial osteotomy. (August 2022)
- Main Title:
- A biomechanical study: Comparison of three different implant options in high Tibial osteotomy
- Authors:
- Key, Sefa
Demir, Sukru
Aydın, Oğuz
Say, Yakup
Erten, Mehmet - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Many implant options could be preferable for fixation after osteotomy in varus knee medial compartment arthrosis. Due to usage characteristics, it is important to compare the biomechanical properties of them. For this purpose, we aimed to examine three different implant types biomechanically in our study. Methods: Ovine tibiae undergoing medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy were fixed in vitro with three different implants using an angular wedge plate, a metal block plate and an external fixator system. The fixed ovine tibiae were subjected to axial tensile, axial loading and three-point bending tests in a test machine. All biomechanical tests were repeated five times, the maximum and minimum values were ignored, and the average values of the remaining three test results were taken into account. The test results were interpreted after converted into force-elongation curves in Trapezium-X software. Findings: Biomechanical test results revealed some differences between implant types. While the metal block plate had the highest axial tensile strength value, it was the fixation group showing the lowest strength in axial load tests. The used fixator system was the highest strength in axial load tests and the lowest strength in axial tensile tests. Interpretation: Considering the clinically significant forces related to the biomechanical stability of the three different implants used for high tibial osteotomy, the fixator system would appear to be slightlyAbstract: Background: Many implant options could be preferable for fixation after osteotomy in varus knee medial compartment arthrosis. Due to usage characteristics, it is important to compare the biomechanical properties of them. For this purpose, we aimed to examine three different implant types biomechanically in our study. Methods: Ovine tibiae undergoing medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy were fixed in vitro with three different implants using an angular wedge plate, a metal block plate and an external fixator system. The fixed ovine tibiae were subjected to axial tensile, axial loading and three-point bending tests in a test machine. All biomechanical tests were repeated five times, the maximum and minimum values were ignored, and the average values of the remaining three test results were taken into account. The test results were interpreted after converted into force-elongation curves in Trapezium-X software. Findings: Biomechanical test results revealed some differences between implant types. While the metal block plate had the highest axial tensile strength value, it was the fixation group showing the lowest strength in axial load tests. The used fixator system was the highest strength in axial load tests and the lowest strength in axial tensile tests. Interpretation: Considering the clinically significant forces related to the biomechanical stability of the three different implants used for high tibial osteotomy, the fixator system would appear to be slightly superior, although it should be noted that torsional forces, as well as parameters that could change in living tissue, might affect the results. Highlights: Biomechanical stability of three implants evaluated in high tibial osteotomy. External fixator system stands out a bit stabile than others. Metal block plate has the highest axial tensile strength value. Metal block plate has the lowest strength in axial load tests. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical biomechanics. Volume 98(2022)
- Journal:
- Clinical biomechanics
- Issue:
- Volume 98(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 98, Issue 2022 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 98
- Issue:
- 2022
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0098-2022-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2022-08
- Subjects:
- Proximal tibial osteotomy -- Medial open-wedge osteotomy -- varus knees -- Biomechanics -- Fixation
Biomechanics -- Periodicals
Osteopathic medicine -- Periodicals
Biomechanics -- Periodicals
Osteopathic Medicine -- Periodicals
612.76 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/02680033 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2022.105722 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0268-0033
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3286.262800
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23056.xml