Understanding the Uptake and Challenges of Genetic Testing Guidelines for Prostate Cancer Patients. (2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Suri, Yash; Yasmeh, Jonathan Parham; Basu, Arnab
• Is Part Of: Cancer treatment and research communications. Number 32(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022
• Subjects: Prostate cancer -- Genetic testing -- NCCN guidelines -- Precision medicine
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2022.100588
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2468-2942

Abstract

Highlights: 39% of the eligible prostate cancer patients were referred, with testing completed in 11% with indications. 30% of providers reported they would be comfortable completing genetic counseling themselves and identified barriers to provide genetic testing themselves were lack of time and expertise. Identified systemic barriers included: lack of genetic counselor workforce (70%), lack of knowledge of genetic testing and the inadequate co-ordination of referrals (60%). Abstract: Background: Multiple studies have confirmed a high prevalence of prognostic germline mutations in prostate cancer. In recognition, the NCCN guidelines and recommendations for genetic counselling (GC) in prostate cancer patients were expanded. Methods: Data on prostate cancer patients at a single tertiary cancer center from January 2019 – June 2019 were queried. The cohort of patients from the queried list were evaluated for their eligibility for genetic testing. From the patients that were eligible for testing, the rate of referrals was ascertained. A 10-item questionnaire was concurrently sent to providers to understand germline genetic testing patterns and potential barriers. Results: Only 39% of the eligible prostate cancer patients were referred, with testing completed in 11% with indications. 30% of providers reported they would be comfortable completing genetic counseling themselves. The identified barriers to provide genetic testing themselves were lack of time and expertise (50%). Other barriers included: lack of genetic counselor workforce (70%), lack of knowledge of genetic testing and the inadequate co-ordination of referrals (60%). Conclusion: In this retrospective study, many patients met the criteria for GC, however, the referrals for this patient population are inconsistent, and only a handful of the eligible patients completed testing. Identified barriers were provider's knowledge and comfort with guidelines and testing, systemic bottlenecks such as limited capacity of genetic counsellors, and the creation of improved workflows.