Size Matters: the Influence of Trap and Mesh Size on Turtle Captures. (30th March 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Size Matters: the Influence of Trap and Mesh Size on Turtle Captures. (30th March 2021)
- Main Title:
- Size Matters: the Influence of Trap and Mesh Size on Turtle Captures
- Authors:
- Ennen, Joshua R.
Cecala, Kristen K.
Gould, Philip
Colvin, Robert
Denison, Jeremy
Garig, Dustin F.
Hyder, Saidee
Recker, Lewis
Davenport, Jon M. - Abstract:
- ABSTRACT: Methods used in wildlife ecology can influence population‐ and community‐level estimates, such as species richness, sex ratio, age and size structure, occupancy and detection probabilities, and community composition. Various trapping and sampling biases exist for freshwater turtles including bait and trap choice and survey technique. To date, no study has investigated the influence of hoop net and mesh size on various population‐ and community‐level estimates. Here, we use detection models to determine if trap and mesh size influence detection probability of nine species of freshwater turtles over 3 consecutive years (2016–2018) in west Tennessee. Additionally, we use multivariate models to determine if freshwater turtle community composition was influenced by hoop trap and mesh sizes. Our results indicated that there was a bias related to mesh size in detection probabilities and community composition. Smaller mesh sized traps were better at detecting smaller‐bodied turtle species, which then changed community species richness but not catch‐per‐unit‐effort estimates (i.e., abundance). Additionally, larger mesh sized traps were better at detecting common snapping turtles ( Chelydra serpentina ), which supports previous research. Our results suggest that researchers should account for the variation in detection probabilities by mesh size when conducting mark‐recapture and occupancy analyses. Moreover, erroneous inferences about population trends and changes inABSTRACT: Methods used in wildlife ecology can influence population‐ and community‐level estimates, such as species richness, sex ratio, age and size structure, occupancy and detection probabilities, and community composition. Various trapping and sampling biases exist for freshwater turtles including bait and trap choice and survey technique. To date, no study has investigated the influence of hoop net and mesh size on various population‐ and community‐level estimates. Here, we use detection models to determine if trap and mesh size influence detection probability of nine species of freshwater turtles over 3 consecutive years (2016–2018) in west Tennessee. Additionally, we use multivariate models to determine if freshwater turtle community composition was influenced by hoop trap and mesh sizes. Our results indicated that there was a bias related to mesh size in detection probabilities and community composition. Smaller mesh sized traps were better at detecting smaller‐bodied turtle species, which then changed community species richness but not catch‐per‐unit‐effort estimates (i.e., abundance). Additionally, larger mesh sized traps were better at detecting common snapping turtles ( Chelydra serpentina ), which supports previous research. Our results suggest that researchers should account for the variation in detection probabilities by mesh size when conducting mark‐recapture and occupancy analyses. Moreover, erroneous inferences about population trends and changes in diversity within turtle communities through time could cause managers to misidentify population declines and conservation value of a site. © 2021 The Wildlife Society. Abstract : Mesh size of hoop nets causes variation in turtle community indices along with occupancy and detection probabilities. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Wildlife Society bulletin. Volume 45:Number 1(2021)
- Journal:
- Wildlife Society bulletin
- Issue:
- Volume 45:Number 1(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 45, Issue 1 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 45
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0045-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 130
- Page End:
- 137
- Publication Date:
- 2021-03-30
- Subjects:
- biases -- chelonian -- comparability -- conservation -- diversity -- Testudinidae
Wildlife management -- Periodicals
Wildlife conservation -- Periodicals
333.9540973 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1938-5463a ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/wsb.1163 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0091-7648
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 9317.488000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23039.xml