Uncertainty quantification for Multiphase-CFD simulations of bubbly flows: a machine learning-based Bayesian approach supported by high-resolution experiments. (August 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Uncertainty quantification for Multiphase-CFD simulations of bubbly flows: a machine learning-based Bayesian approach supported by high-resolution experiments. (August 2021)
- Main Title:
- Uncertainty quantification for Multiphase-CFD simulations of bubbly flows: a machine learning-based Bayesian approach supported by high-resolution experiments
- Authors:
- Liu, Yang
Wang, Dewei
Sun, Xiaodong
Liu, Yang
Dinh, Nam
Hu, Rui - Abstract:
- Highlights: UQ for complex engineering problems with support of high-resolution experiments. Combination of PCA and FNN for efficient and accurate surrogate modeling. Consideration of epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty with modular Bayesian approach. Developed framework extensible to other high-resolution, moderate-fidelity model. Abstract: In this paper, we developed a machine learning-based Bayesian approach to inversely quantify and reduce the uncertainties of multiphase computational fluid dynamics (MCFD) simulations for bubbly flows. The proposed approach is supported by high-resolution two-phase flow measurements, including those by double-sensor conductivity probes, high-speed imaging, and particle image velocimetry. Local distributions of key physical quantities of interest (QoIs), including the void fraction and phasic velocities, are obtained to support the Bayesian inference. In the process, the epistemic uncertainties of the closure relations are inversely quantified while the aleatory uncertainties from stochastic fluctuations of the system are evaluated based on experimental uncertainty analysis. The combined uncertainties are then propagated through the MCFD solver to obtain uncertainties of the QoIs, based on which probability-boxes are constructed for validation. The proposed approach relies on three machine learning methods: feedforward neural networks and principal component analysis for surrogate modeling, and Gaussian processes for model formHighlights: UQ for complex engineering problems with support of high-resolution experiments. Combination of PCA and FNN for efficient and accurate surrogate modeling. Consideration of epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty with modular Bayesian approach. Developed framework extensible to other high-resolution, moderate-fidelity model. Abstract: In this paper, we developed a machine learning-based Bayesian approach to inversely quantify and reduce the uncertainties of multiphase computational fluid dynamics (MCFD) simulations for bubbly flows. The proposed approach is supported by high-resolution two-phase flow measurements, including those by double-sensor conductivity probes, high-speed imaging, and particle image velocimetry. Local distributions of key physical quantities of interest (QoIs), including the void fraction and phasic velocities, are obtained to support the Bayesian inference. In the process, the epistemic uncertainties of the closure relations are inversely quantified while the aleatory uncertainties from stochastic fluctuations of the system are evaluated based on experimental uncertainty analysis. The combined uncertainties are then propagated through the MCFD solver to obtain uncertainties of the QoIs, based on which probability-boxes are constructed for validation. The proposed approach relies on three machine learning methods: feedforward neural networks and principal component analysis for surrogate modeling, and Gaussian processes for model form uncertainty modeling. The whole process is implemented within the framework of an open-source deep learning library PyTorch with graphics processing unit (GPU) acceleration, thus ensuring the efficiency of the computation. The results demonstrate that with the support of high-resolution data, the uncertainties of MCFD simulations can be significantly reduced. The proposed approach has the potential for other applications that involve numerical models with empirical parameters. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Reliability engineering & system safety. Volume 212(2021)
- Journal:
- Reliability engineering & system safety
- Issue:
- Volume 212(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 212, Issue 2021 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 212
- Issue:
- 2021
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0212-2021-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-08
- Subjects:
- Reliability (Engineering) -- Periodicals
System safety -- Periodicals
Industrial safety -- Periodicals
Fiabilité -- Périodiques
Sécurité des systèmes -- Périodiques
Sécurité du travail -- Périodiques
620.00452 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09518320 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107636 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0951-8320
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 7356.422700
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 23008.xml