Pragmatic randomized trial assessing the impact of digital health technology on quality of life in patients with heart failure: Design, rationale and implementation. Issue 8 (12th July 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Victoria‐Castro, Angela M.; Martin, Melissa; Yamamoto, Yu; Ahmad, Tariq; Arora, Tanima; Calderon, Frida; Desai, Nihar; Gerber, Brett; Lee, Kyoung A.; Jacoby, Daniel; Melchinger, Hannah; Nguyen, Andrew; Shaw, Melissa; Simonov, Michael; Williams, Alyssa; Weinstein, Jason; Wilson, Francis P.
• Is Part Of: Clinical cardiology. Volume 45:Issue 8(2022)
• Page Start: 839
• Page End: 849
• Publication Date: 2022-07-12
• Subjects: digital health technology -- heart failure; Cardiology -- Periodicals; 616.12005
• DOI: 10.1002/clc.23848
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0160-9289

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Self‐care and patient engagement are important elements of heart failure (HF) care, endorsed in the guidelines. Digital health tools may improve quality of life (QOL) in HF patients by promoting care, knowledge, and engagement. This manuscript describes the rationale and challenges of the design and implementation of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of three digital health technologies in improving QOL for patients with HF. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that digital health interventions will improve QOL of HF patients through the early detection of warning signs of disease exacerbation, the opportunity of self‐tracking symptoms, and the education provided, which enhances patient empowerment. Methods: Using a fully electronic enrollment and consent platform, the trial will randomize 200 patients across HF clinics in the Yale New Haven Health system to receive either usual care or one of three digital technologies designed to promote self‐management and provide critical data to clinicians. The primary outcome is the change in QOL as assessed by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire at 3 months. Results: First enrollment occurred in September 2021. Recruitment was anticipated to last 6–8 months and participants were followed for 6 months after randomization. Our recruitment efforts have highlighted the large digital divide in our population of interest. Conclusion: Assessing clinical outcomes, patient usability, and ease of clinical integration of digital technologies will be beneficial in determining the feasibility of the integration of such technologies into the healthcare system.