A Comparative Analysis of Catheter Directed Thrombolysis with Anticoagulation Alone or Systemic tPA in Acute Pulmonary Embolism with Cor Pulmonale. (October 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Krishnan, Anand Muthu; Gadela, Naga Vaishnavi; Ramanathan, Rudra; Jha, Anil; Perkins, Michael E.; Metersky, Mark L.
• Is Part Of: Journal of intensive care medicine. Volume 37:Number 10(2022)
• Page Start: 1336
• Page End: 1343
• Publication Date: 2022-10
• Subjects: pulmonary embolism with RV dysfunction -- CDT -- systemic t-PA -- national inpatient sample; Critical care medicine -- Periodicals; Critical Care -- Periodicals; Soins intensifs -- Périodiques; Soins intensifs; Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme); Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme); 616.02805
• DOI: 10.1177/08850666221083241
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0885-0666

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary embolism (PE) with cor pulmonale causes considerable mortality and morbidity. Randomized trials have failed to show a mortality difference between treatment modalities including anticoagulation (AC), Catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) and systemic tPA (tissue plasminogen activator). Methods: This is a cross-sectional retrospective case-control study utilizing the 2017 National Inpatient Sample (NIS). Patients admitted with acute PE with cor pulmonale were divided into groups based on whether they received anticoagulation, CDT or systemic tPA based on appropriate ICD-10 PCS codes. The AC group and CDT group were compared using univariate and multivariate analyses after adjusting for age, gender, race, comorbidities, insurance status and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). Secondary outcomes included factors influencing length of stay (LOS) and total charges incurred. Similar analyses were done to compare the CDT group with the tPA group. Results: In 2017, 13240 patients were admitted with acute PE and cor pulmonale, of whom 18% underwent CDT, 10% underwent systemic tPA and 72% underwent AC alone. Patients who received CDT over AC alone were significantly younger (61.5 vs. 65.5, p = 0.00). Mortality rate overall was 4.8% with tPA group, CDT group and AC alone group having a 11.2%, 3.0% and 4.4% mortality rate respectively. On multivariate analyses, there was no significant mortality difference between the CDT and AC groups (aOR 0.61, 0.34-1.1 95%CI, p = 0.103). Patients with liver disease had significantly higher mortality while obese patients had a significantly lower mortality after adjusting for treatment strategy and confounders. Length of stay (LOS) was not significantly different between the groups however, compared to AC alone, patients who underwent CDT or tPA incurred significantly higher total hospital charges. Conclusions: CDT offers an attractive alternative to tPA therapy; however, our study does not show an in-hospital mortality benefit. More studies are required to guide patient selection prior to establishing treatment protocols.