Comparison of Open and Robot-Assisted Kidney Transplantation in terms of Perioperative and Postoperative Outcomes. (6th May 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Karadag, Serdar; Eksi, Mithat; Ozdemir, Osman; Kargi, Taner; Haciislamoglu, Ahmet; Evren, Ismail; Polat, Hakan; Sokmen, Dogukan; Ozlu, Deniz Noyan; Sahin, Selcuk; Tugcu, Volkan
• Other Names: Chen Tun-Chieh Academic Editor.
• Is Part Of: International journal of clinical practice. Volume 2022(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-05-06
• Subjects: Clinical medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1155/2022/2663108
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1368-5031

Abstract

Abstract : Background . The gold standard treatment method for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is renal transplantation (RT). RT can be done with open or minimally invasive surgical methods. We aimed to compare the outcomes between patients who underwent robot-assisted renal transplantation (RART) and open renal transplantation (ORT). Methods . Data of the patients who underwent ORT or RART in two institutions between June 2015 and February 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent live donor RT were included, and all donor nephrectomy procedures were performed by the laparoscopic technique. Demographic data, ischemia times, anastomosis times, operation times, and postoperative complications were recorded. Results . 98 patients were included in the ORT group, while 91 patients were included in the RART group. There was a significant difference between the two groups regarding mean patient age. While total ischemia time was 86.9 ± 7 minutes in the RART group, it was calculated as 71.2 ± 3.3 minutes in the ORT group, with a significant difference. The anastomosis time was significantly shorter in the ORT group than in the RART group. The incision length and duration of hospital stay were significantly shorter, visual analogue scores were significantly lower, and estimated blood loss was less in the RART group than in the ORT group. Conclusion . Both ORT and RART are effective and safe methods for treating ESRD. According to our study, RART is associated with relatively longer ischemia times but lower complication rates and higher patient comfort.